Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Diversifying supply chain from single source (Score 3, Informative) 25

It is insane that major US companies are making trillion-dollar bets that a single-source provider will remain operational.

You are aware TSMC has built two chip fabs in Arizona and building a third one, right? You are also aware that Samsung built a chip fab in Texas over 20 years ago and is building a second one, right?

Comment Re:Second sourcing, multiple suppliers, etc. (Score 1) 25

Except that they would have to presumably reengineer the old silicon for Intel's process, which kind of defeats the purpose of reusing old designs to save money, I would think.

Or more likely, Intel will have to adapt their processes to Apple designs and for other companies if Intel wants to do business as a chip foundry.

Apple also uses CPUs in things like the Apple Watch

Off the top of my head, here are the other processors Apple uses: Apple Watch, Homepod (S series), AirPods (H series), modems (C series). There are millions to tens of millions of these processors that Apple will need each year.

Comment Re:Second sourcing, multiple suppliers, etc. (Score 2) 25

Not at all. Apple used Intel CPUs for 15 years. The great "PC vs Mac" debate is about the user experience, not the hardware architecture of the CPU behind it, and certainly not what foundry a CPU comes from.

The main reason Apple left Intel was all on Intel for not making progress for years on chips. This was the same reason Apple left IBM. Apple thought that by using Intel they would not be in the same situation again. Little did anyone know how Intel would struggle at 10nm for years. It is unlikely that Apple will ever go back to using x86 for their main processors though.

Intel these days is more open to being a chip foundry like TSMC than before. Apple using Intel to fabricate their chips as a secondary supplier makes business sense for everyone.

Comment Re:Need SuperKendall's take (Score 1) 25

How great is it that Trump requires Apple to do business with Intel, the spin will be delightful.

And why is this "great"? The main reason Apple stopped sourcing chips from Intel had nothing to do with politics. It was due to Intel's stagnation in making chips. Intel was stuck for years while AMD passed them by. Apple finally had enough. Some would call that just business.

Please, please, please let it be Apple's main processors. A hysterical black eye to Intel and a kick in the balls to Apple fanboys. Win win!

Again the issue was entirely Intel's incompetence at making progress for years. Apple would probably keep buying chips from Intel if they were good chips. After all Apple bought Intel's entire modem business from them. More than likely Intel will make other chips for Apple first. For example every AirPod requires a chip. Every Apple Watch requires a chip. Apple modem chip C1 could be fabricated by Intel.

Comment Re:Microsoft part right, part wrong (Score 1) 107

You fail to actually detail how passwords that exist in a password manager can be compromised in Chrome. A keylogger can only record what the user types. If Windows Hello or biometric authentication is turned on, the user does not type in the authentication password nor the site password. Also you seem to forget that while company equipment is not yours, there is compartmentalization put in place from one bad actor being able to infiltrate multiple systems. An IT support person should not be able to access HR, Payroll, etc.

Comment Re:I'd love to trash Edge, but... (Score 1) 107

Er, I meant if they have enough control to dump RAM. Thinko because what I was thinking is that if they can dump RAM they can dump your password database, too (unless user authentication is in the loop and that authentication relies on secrets not in the device).

By default, authentication is required. So dumping the password database dumps encrypted passwords as authentication is a separate process. Also Chrome requires authentication each time for each password; only Edge requires authentication once to load the entire database. Only Edge has the very flawed design you are assuming happens for all browsers. And that does not factor into additional hardware protections. For some Android phones and iPhones/Macs, the password database does not exist on any hard drive. The password database is stored in a separate security chip. So dumping the password database would be extremely difficult as access to the chip is not direct.

Comment Re:Motherboards are useless without RAM (Score 1) 69

Yes, the main problem is many people who want upgrade their motherboards now generally will be upgrading from a prior generation that used DDR4. The current DDR5 shortage makes that difficult. Whereas consumers could re-use their existing SSDs, case, GPU, etc, they will need DDR5 RAM. I have seen DD4 conversion kits being sold now where a user can put DDR4 memory into an adapter that fits DDR5 slots. I have no idea how well they work.

Comment Re:Fraction inflation? (Score 1) 69

I think one nuance is the bad comparison and wording. Asus sold 15M in 2025. As of today in 2026, they have shipped 5M. Those are not the same metrics. Shipped is not the same as sold. It might be that the reporter only has sales numbers for 2025 and inventory numbers for 2026 as reported by Asus; however, Asus could also conflating the two numbers.

Comment Re:And are permanent? (Score 1) 87

You still have not answered the question since you have never actually done it. Do the messages still persist after scrubbing? Your answer is you don't know; you assume. From my experience with version control systems, the content can be scrubbed. The metadata persists. These messages are metadata.

Slashdot Top Deals

The more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain.

Working...