Comment Re:NOT LUNAR SOIL (Score 1) 54
This is more a testament to the snake oil that super foods actually are than on the nutritional value of the humble Solanum tuberosum.
This is more a testament to the snake oil that super foods actually are than on the nutritional value of the humble Solanum tuberosum.
Where are the power plants for these?
And then someone will agree to step in only if everyone else will warrant him that he will not be punished for his honest mistakes, and you just reinvented Qualified Immunity.
This is exactly the effect renewables are having on the market. The value of "I can provide 1000 units when I feel like it" vs "I can provide 1000 units when you need them" is not being properly priced.
Renewables, especially Solar and Wind, are so cheap, you can simply switch them off when not needed. That's quite different to a nuclear power plant.
Nuclear about $10 billion to build, varies wildly between countries but $10 billion in a sane country. No back up battery needed.
Nuclear needs really large ways to store electricity. As a nuclear plant can not be shut down easily when less power is required, it needs a way to get rid of the additional energy. Usually, it's stored into large pumped-storage hydroelectricity plants, and you need to include their cost too.
On a side note, people are always waving the baseload flag, without every asking themselves what baseload actually means: It's a source of energy which (except when shut down for maintenance or an unforeseen event) always provides the same amount of electricity - completely independent of the actual needs. That means that baseload energy can not react on short term price signals, and that means, that for a large part of its running time, it's not running economically, and more so, it has to be kept running even when cheaper sources of energy are available, causing them to be shut down instead and hence increasing the average price of electricity. Basically, it's the "bad money drives out good money" or Gresham's law all over again.
That, and "gainful employment" usually means a person has a job with pay that meets their living expenses plus a bit. What living expenses do these robots have, except for the livings they take from humans?
He's also a fool when it comes to politics. People should want government writing rules and picking winners for AI just as much as for social and news media: not picking winners at all, and setting as few and as narrow rules as possible. Do you want the default (or only) AI service to run like the DMV?
Betteridge's Law continues to hold true.
This is pure passive aggressive grey beard Linux snobbery masquerading as thoughtful commentary
Apple is bsd Unix and has a complete set of Unix tools. Apple knows there customers needs probably better than any maker and you never were going to be one.
The whole point of this is it's inexpensive. Ic you desire more power it's not for you
In 1790, the US population was 94.9% rural. There is no country. in the world today that rural -- Burundi, which looks like blanks spot in the world at night satellite picturs, is 88% rural.
The largest city at the time was New York, with a population of 33,000. Northern Manhattan was near-wilderness, mid-town was farms and country houses.
In 1790 the US was. country you could "police" with sheriffs and volunteer posses, largely to keep the peace. If you got robbed, you hired a private thief catcher. This works in a 95% rural country with just 3.4 million inhabitants. It would be chaos in a country 87x larger.
Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.