Did you report back and inform the LLM of the solution, so it could improve its answers?

Also, does /. permit LLMs to drag the /. swamp and scrape out these nuggets?

It's the opposite of a dummy load in electronics. Dummy loads are intended to safely dissipate power, while AI bots are intended to broadcast...

From Sec 230a:

(a) Findings
The Congress finds the following:

(1) The rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens.

(2) These services offer users a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops.

(3) The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.

(4) The Internet and other interactive computer services have flourished, to the benefit of all Americans, with a minimum of government regulation.

(5) Increasingly Americans are relying on interactive media for a variety of political, educational, cultural, and entertainment services.

From the beginning:

- The Internet has developed and expanded sufficiently that it no longer needs the protection nor encouragement offered via this legislation.
- The development of the Internet has actually reduced and limited users' control over the information they have access to. That is censorship, for those of you in Rio Linda.
- The development of censorship, protected by Sec 230, has challenged the development of true diversity of political discourse, unless you're considering false information and misrepresentation to be diversity. And there is an argument for that.
- The Internet is suffering under implicit government regulation. Sec 230 here is somewhat defeating one of its own stated purposes.
- Americans, and indeed the world, are relying on the Internet so much more than they did prior to enactment of Sec 230. it is even more important now.

Sec 230 is used to permit Internet 'publishers' to escape responsibility for their censorship, promotion, and fabrications., Not that fabrication in the American press is anything new, and has never needed legislative protection before. But the Internet is the current means of yellow journalism, and as such needs nor should have protection beyond the First Amendment. Repeal it now.

The real surprise here is that the people who run WaPo think the AI-generated posts are different than their regular WaPo-generated posts...

Actually, they knew that all along. They just had to issue disclaimers to redirect the prols to the preexisting sources of misinformation. And to run interference, adding an apparent air of legitimacy to the human-generated content.

For years they adamantly insisted they didn't need to upgrade their room making and navigation tech while Asian companies hungrily iterated improvements.
When other companies integrated vacuum AND mopping tech, Roomba refused because they'd rather try to sell you 2x separate $200 devices.

This is simply a case where an early leader got it's head so far up it's own ass it didn't realize it was being left behind. Or rather, it saw all the signs and insisted they were wrong.

Oh well. Evolution requires death of the unfit.

"Polar bears are still sadly expected to go extinct this century," with two-thirds of the population gone by 2050," says the lead researcher on a new study from the University of East Anglia in Britain.

Well.
As recently as 2018 widespread studies showed that only 3 of 20 wild population groups were decreasing, and the overall number of polar bears was increasing steadily.

Now the propaganda engines have gotten going, the litany is "well we didn't know the data very precisely before so we were guessing, making it appear that populations were growing when they weren't"

Funny how data is only considered precise when it validates that the sky is falling.

There are two polar possibilities (ofc there are gradations between, for the pedants) :

94% of the time Trump is wrong and the Supreme Court is simply ruling on ideological grounds to support him
Or
This is a signal of vastly out of control lawfare, where legions of well funded legal teams cherry pick activist ideological judges to give them the rulings they want, which then fail when finally tested against strict rules of constitutionality

Personally I'd say leftists are just pissed that their usual passing lane is blocked - using the courts when they can't get legislation passed has been their (rather reliably successful) tactic for 50 years.

It is also true that something that's nice and convenient isn't a necessity, either.

I fully agree that it's nice.
I fully agree that it's convenient.
It requires a fair amount of self-discipline; there are some employees that can handle that, and some that cannot.

Ideally, a company would evaluate you on your performance & productivity, not where you're sitting.

It's still not "a necessity" that's bullshit hyperbole.

Scratch a liberal and you always, always find an absolute fascist.

We MUST contribute to the greater good, you say? There is no opt-out? Or else what?

And we all know who gets to decide what is the greater good, right?
Certainly not that ridiculous "democracy" that would vote against electric cars.

PBS is primarily (85%) privately funded. It will continue to produce shows like Masterpiece, Nova, Frontline, and Sesame Street and people in places like Boston or Philadelphia will continue to benefit from them.

What public funding does is give viewers in poorer, more rural areas access to the same information that wealthy cities enjoy. It pays for access for people who don't have it.

By opting out, Arkansas public broadcasting saves 2.5 million dollars in dues, sure. But it loses access to about $300 million dollars in privately funded programming annually.

Piling on, Arizona Corporation Commission races are indeed contentious. They bring out activists that desperately want to turn Arizona into a California clone.

And I doubt the ACC will try to force this datacenter on Chandler. If you wonder how our Democrat Governor thinks of things, she is busy celebrating an "Ag-to-Urban” Groundwater Conservation Approval", just to ensure 825 new homes can be built in Buckeye, which were blocked because metro Phoenix does not have sufficient assurances of water supply for the next 100 years to permit further growth in that city.

It's darned hard to oppose development in Arizona. Too many stakeholders want to make their profits. Even Katie Hobbs will bow to them. Oh, wait, she bows to whoever greases the skids.

... How working in an office was the standard for centuries but somehow in the last 5 years has become a necessity.

Seriously, the idea that we know all the practically important physics there is is the kind of thing only somebody who's never done science or engineering would believe.

The entire place is a swampy echo chamber.

Paid for by taxpayer dollars. Oh, and the public funding drives.
(which of these is "the most important" depends on who's begging in front of whom) ...oh and $2.5 million per state? So a flat $125 mill annually?

"The commission's decision to drop PBS membership is a blow to Arkansans who will lose free, over the air access to quality PBS programming they know and love,"
IT'S CLEARLY NOT FREE.