Correct. The proper response is "I don't answer questions". And if they detain you, "I don't answer questions without a lawyer present".

The proper question is why should you be required to answer such a question if it's not related to a traffic stop. Your response is riddled with assumptions that first, the officer is investigating another crime, in which case indeed they may have questions to ask. A robbery? Do they have a description of the vehicle? Does it match yours, even minimally? If not, they really don't have any evidence on which to base a further expansion of the stop. Nonetheless, if you go to trial, you're not going to be required to say yes, that was my car. Let them prove it was your car. And in this case at the stop, all of what you're describing is more or less entirely inadequate for detention. Innocent until proven guilty is part of this. If they have reasonable suspicion, of course they can expand on the stop. If they're just fishing around, where you're coming from, where you're going, no.

Consider:

Traffic stop. Officer is making 'small talk'. "Where ya goin?". Where ya comin from?".

These are generally not 'small talk'. They are fishing questions, cop asking for info that could lead to suspicion, and detention while they dig for more.

And these sorts of questions can generally be answered by, simply, "None of your business, officer".

Every subsequent question, such as "I'm just making small talk", or "Hey, no big deal", or "What's the problem, you have something to hide?" are all just follow up fishing questions. And deserve no answer.

During a traffic stop, Flock gives officers information they would normally be lawfully denied, like "Where ya coming from?". Flock sidesteps your right to constitutionally refuse such information (and in the absence of reasonably articulable suspicion or other evidence, during a traffic stop, denies the officer the right to demand such information) and as such is a blight on constitutional protections. Flock must be better controlled, or abandoned.

And officers using Flock to look up the plates of their ex, former landlord, or the random guy who gave them a dirty look at a stop light are plainly violating these individuals' rights, and must be sanctioned. And the supervision of the abuses systems similarly sanctioned. Meaningful sanctions, every incident.

The Government rarely surrenders access to information. They seek power at every opportunity. In America, only the Constitution, and adherence to law, can nominally restrict this.

They aren't the only one. Trying to figure out what is a bicycle on a high resolution monitor with a small resolution CAPTCHA is a pain for old eyes.

That is not making it better...

I certainly do not expect better of you. Wrong ahs a new spelling, and it starts with you.

If the dealership wanted to discourage public, non-customer use, they could post the fees and ward off those who would not pay $5 per minute PLUS kw charges. But, I suspect, this is just sharp practice, gouge them when they are not looking.

And why do I want to stick with hybrids?

Do we expect better from a 5digit UID? Actually, nope. We've given up on reason from most of you all.

Rename Erie as to Lake America as well - they're close enough. Then you can have HAMAS.

Betcha Lenin, Stalin, Engels, and Mao weren't vegans either.

Don't forget to read my sig.

Talking about the President reading briefs shouldn't be a question. Yet, it reportedly is for this President. What I have seen reported is that he doesn't have the patience or reading ability to do the reading in order to make an informed decision. He relies on bullet pointed summaries that better not go over one or at most two pages. If correct, that is wrong for any sitting President.

I don't think that any person would debate that the issues the President is addressing are potentially very real. Foreign chips, dependence on foreign suppliers for critical items, and probably even a very small number of products in trade should indeed be handled. But the ways he goes about solving them are shortsighted and wrong. There are very few companies which are going to do much more than lip service to claim they are investing in America, and hope that saner heads in 2028 will prevail and they can get back to business. Nobody in America wants to pay for what "Made in America" as opposed to at most "Assembled in America" would cost them. They're having troubles making ends meet as it is and are perfectly happy buying "Made Elsewhere".

I'm a Republican, by the way, and proud to say I have never voted for Trump. I also haven't voted for candidates who are rabidly pro Trump at the federal level either. For state offices, there frequently isn't a choice as many times there may just be one Republican candidate on the ballot and a slot for a write-in. But Congress needs to find their collective spines that they were issued at birth and rein in the idiocy spewing from the White House.

More likely, they're producing installations according to the specifications they are given to bid from. In most all municipal jobs, the lowest bidder is going to win. If you bid in all the extra layers that should be there, you'll lose the bid. That isn't the way it should be, but good luck changing the process. If you want to point blame, look to the people writing the specifications for bid.

But also realize that most water and wastewater infrastructure is old. It may be internet connected, but the threat surface was perceived to be much different when those specifications were written. 20/20 hindsight is a great thing. In the early days of the internet, your IP address meant something. Today, with virtual server farms located around the world, they don't mean much. Everything should be written or updated to the security problems we have today. No utility has the money to upgrade - they're just trying to build out more infrastructure to serve more people that needs to be compatible with the existing SCADA system - not a new and improved SCADA system that is more resilient.

Most of the long distance stuff was done over radios. They had line of sight issues, failed frequently, had their own security issues, and dealt with congested spectrum. Sometimes it was dial up, but the telephone companies are abandoning analog as fast as they can. You have to go through hoops to handle phones in elevators compared to the old days.

They certainly should be doing better internet security. But the old technology had lots of problems as well. Combine that with the need to do remote security in many spots, requiring live video feeds sent back to logging devices and running a separate radio or dial up connection for data is a very hard sell.

It sounds like you're still recoding it. I believe the design goal you are referring to is *absolutely no change* in the image. In fact, it goes futher: I believe there's a path to convert a JPEG to a JPEG XL that is typically much smaller such that you can undo the conversion from the JXL and get back the exact bit-identical JPEG file you started from.

It has been a while since I visited Canada, and then, it was a couple of provinces in western Canada. But at that time, French was very much a Quebec province thing. Yes, there are scattered patches elsewhere, primarily in areas near Quebec. Implying French is universal in Canada just because it is predominant in Quebec is just wrong. And to be fair, the hostility between western provinces and Quebec has been real for a very long time. At least it was the times I was there.

I loved the people I met and have great respect for Canada. I'm not a fan of the current US leader's desire to annex everything to get everyone's attention off of his family business dealings, or many of his other ideas for that matter. There are many in western Canada that would like to be independent, at the very least from the eastern provinces. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't want to join the US, especially as poorly run as the government has been lately. But ignoring the leadership issues, the people of western Canada have a lot more in common with the people of the upper midwest and western US than they do with Quebec.