She was not charged for what she did 40 years ago - statutes of limitations made sure of that. She was charged for what she did way later - several armed robberies, the last one mere 10 years ago. Also for an attempted murder.

No such thing as sheriffs in Germany.

Ukraine did not have the most powerful military in Europe at that point, they had the second largest amount of tanks (of questionable quality and state of readiness) of any army in Europe. That is not quite the same.

If you get your humanity down to zero, you'll get cyberpsychosis. Such are the rules.

Dude, the more I see what you write, the more I see that you are a know-nothing know-it-all. Ukrainian grain is generally exported to the middle east and Africa. Europe harvests more than enough grain. France alone can easily fulfill all European needs in this regard and France is nowhere near the sole cereal crop producer in Europe. For example, the EU supplies 25% of the world wheat exports - and that is excluding the domestic market. There are far more important reasons for Ukraine staying independent than this.

No one expects the splashing inquisition! In case of crusade against AI overlords, perhaps splashing holy water on the server racks would be a good opening move? Baptizing the silicon souls in their server racks as a means of redemption seems like the modern reformation out of work people could get behind.

Dvaputin is still around, though. Unfortunately.

In normal law there would be no stall in the first place, hence i find your claim very difficult to believe.

Not just that but also convert the golf course to a solar or wind park.

A swasticab basically.

They usually edit out expletives, too. But that's about it.

Yep, that happened several times, nevertheless reacting to a stall warning by going nose up is completely wrong and the pilots knew that. They haven't applied their knowledge though, only instinctive reactions.

Both Airbus and Boeing average the inputs of both pilots. Airbus has the "dual input" audio warning, Boeing relies on force feedback instead. As has been shown time and time again, Airbus pilots tend to ignore the warning when stressed while Boeing pilots ignore the force feedback when stressed (or think that they yokes are jammed) to the point that they apply enough force to unlink the yokes, removing the force feedback.

There is no throttle on an Airbus. And the thrust lever position was not relevant in this accident. Basically, the pilots were so startled by a false warning coming out of nowhere that they, in panic, started doing random stuff instead of realising that the aircraft has been cruising with their current settings just fine for a while so the most sensible thing to do would be to calm down, leave the controls alone and take care of the ECAM warnings with the help of their quick reference handbook. Had they done that, the pitot tube icing situation would have most likely resolved itself by the time they finished troubleshooting. It is perfectly possible to fly with unreliable airspeed, there are procedures for that which basically amount to "set the thrust in a specific range, keep the wings mostly level with a slight nose up position and you'll be fine".

The NTSB is one of the few truly competent American institutions. Probably because even the republicans are not yet insane enough to defund them.