With your first point you conflate the technology with the devices themselves. The direction of the original poster was correct, look at the armored bulldozers caterpillar sells Israel, they are killing machines meant to crush civilians as well as level structures.
And do you want to tell me it's an impossibility that ICE for example would dip into commercial surveillance networks they previously didn't have access to? The chronology of "they've moved past this tech" doesn't even line up with your absurdist take about using lawnmowers etc.
Phones for all their surveillance uses still won't serve up information about your body state to your employer, which constitutes some of the hype around a future of employers requiring wearables. The public applications are of the sort people would volunteer for: payment and identification including for physical access.
Granted I'm sure there are other technologies that could obsolete needing a chip, but my overall point is that these technologies are presented to the public as a negotiation of conveniences--especially with air travel in particular, where the state has recently seen fit to insert part-time gestapo as a solution to a problem that never existed.
Oh I don't know, maybe read the fucking news the last two days.
NPR is propaganda too: it always serves to whitewash and minimize the crimes of the US and its allies to a liberal audience. It does so in between delightful slice-of-life pieces, some pretty good music selections, and its own variety of vanilla latte capitalism ("Marketplace") where every stupid carbon capture pilot technology is offered to the audience as completely viable for "well-meaning capitalists" (their phrasing, not mine) to invest in.
NPR went hard on the Russiagating as well.
1 Word = 1 Millipicture