You haven't seen the meat maxi-pads yet?

They don't even let you move at a full adult male walking pace? I can go 5 mph without trouble.

He came by Honda. Though he did not speak of it, he came of his own Accord.

So what?

This is bullshit. EVs reach CO2 parity well before 100,000 miles.

Yes, that's a valid thing to say. But EVs have lower lifetime emissions than ICEVs because an ICE is so pathetically inefficient. Yeah 40% is possible for some engines some of the time, but more of the time they are around 25%.

That's the weird beauty of hallucination. It's hallucinating both the explanation and the code. It just turns out that there's no part of the explanation that we can't interpret with small changes in it, while there are parts of the code which must be just so to achieve the desired result.

You're not wrong, but there is nobody anywhere on the planet who cares at all about video container formats who is not familiar with MKV.

I blame realtors. They are always encouraging owners to list properties at inflated prices because they get a bigger commission. I am trying to get a reasonable offer in on a crappy project mobile currently listed at 27,700 and the dickhead I was referred to demanded a $4500 flat broker's fee saying it's his minimum, that's over 15% of the current asking price which is itself too high. Fucker could maybe talk me into 7% tops. That's his flat fee for a mobile? Well this is a currently unliveable project, what's his flat fee for that?

Homes in my area sit for around a year and get reduced around 33% or more before they sell because of these greedy fucks who want to get paid for doing nothing.

The results of their lobbying limit my choices.

If you're quoting, use quotation marks, that's how English works. My English skills won't help if you don't write in English.

"See my comment about boys in the girls room"

Why do you imagine your frothing to be relevant?

"Not seeing how it's the companies that matter."

See no lobbying
Hear no lobbying
Speak only ignorance

It's the AGW denialist way.

"That sounds to me like there could be parts of the world that could benefit from global warming.
I expect people to call that statement above "denialism" when it is not."

Either you are an idiot, a liar, or both, which is my take on your fuckery. All of this has been explained in detail to you already. Even if there were places which would benefit, the net would be negative. But in fact all places will have less predictable weather, so no one will actually benefit.

"Well hidden in the study is the statement "...we assign to each carbon major the emissions associated with the full value chain of their products..."."

By well-hidden you mean "in plain text that I was able to copy and paste" right?

They vote for that over and over again. We not only have both direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels, but they contribute to AGW which also has dramatic costs. You're supporting higher costs RIGHT NOW.

Clowns like you who don't know when things are the same and then step in to defend big oil are the problem. Without you they would be weak, but you're here to do their bidding without, I presume, even getting paid.