Randomness is the problem in LLMs that leads to inconsistency of hallucination. It's being substituted for the part of the processing we do that software can't do yet. Hardware can't do it either, only wetware. The part that (inductively? Instinctively?) knows whether the output makes sense just plain doesn't exist in LLMs.

Cowards who only have whataboutism are my primary detractors, which is how I know I'm right. Thanks, coward.

The question at hand is whether the terms of service should even be allowed to contain those clauses. If you're paying for access to the model, it should be your business what you use the output for. If they don't want you using the data you got out of it, they can not sell you access to it in the first place.

Anyone mad about this should note that $50,000 per year is what In-n-Out Burger pays a FT employee in California, and then they should fuck off to the farthest possible point to fuck off to, and then fuck off some more.

How does one become a high-end skilled worker? Clown.

You don't know shit about logic, son, you only know emphasis.

There are no innocent workers installing surveillance equipment. Zero.

Private prisons are the worst but they aren't the only problem prisons. A government employee's "power" is based on the headcount of their reports. More problems, more headcount, more power. More opportunities for kickbacks and to pocket funds.

By your logic, the pre-school daycare worker at Raytheon should be just as much of a targeted threat as the fighter pilot dropping ordinance in a war zone.

A worker, is hired to mount some shit on a pole. At least try and grasp that’s ALL a flock camera install is instead of assuming a field installer should carry their entire weight of unconstitutional behavior on THEIR backs. There are better ways to fight mass surveillance than to attack the one who had nothing to do with it. Thats how innocent workers end up dead in the streets.

Is it incidental, or is it the system protecting itself? Recidivism leads to profit.

Since the license disclaimed responsibility.

And yet that is the current, prevailing situation. There is no warranty, so you are responsible, full stop. But this is true for closed commercial software as well. If they are exploited and consequently send you malware, it's your problem.

There hasn't been since we moved away from the cathedral model, but you couldn't trust the cathedrals either.

The serious things get integrated into distributions and you can get them that way. If you choose to get them another way in order to get a newer version or a fork, you are taking an additional risk. Again, this is how the bazaar model has always worked. This is not new.

That I can look things up in a dictionary? Fine. I'd rather be on several spectra all day than be an ignorant prick who deludes himself through misuse of words that do not mean what they think they mean but invoke an emotional response that convinces me that I'm right, like a warm blanket of bullshit.

You're choosing to use words that don't mean what you claim they mean on purpose to try to make your argument sound legitimate, by ascribing things to a piece of software which flatly do not apply. It's not a metaphor, it's just moronic.

Riding around with an arms merchant is what killed Diana. Alternatively, some claim she was about to expose something about land mines, but there's really nothing to expose there since nobody doesn't know that people use them and in order for that to happen, someone has to make them and sell them. Nobody wants to know any of this shit because all of the allegedly civilized/developed nations are in on it. They are ALL massive arms dealers. Watch some videos from the UK tank museum sometime, they talk constantly about how these vehicles were sold to that regime and participated in such and such conflict, usually without mentioning that they were acts of oppression or whatnot. It's just all jerking off over military hardware all the time.

So, those who were making "bank" managed to secure the kind of raise that makes military fodder laugh (not an easy feat), while the workers making under $50K were discovered to be essentially slave labor?

Why does 1.25% sounds like a 3% raise adjusted for union costs?

Regarding the bottom rung, if your raise amounts to more than 30% after negotiations, you didn't need a union lawyer. You more needed a criminal attorney. Or enough common sense to know when YOU the grown-ass employee are responsible for at least glancing at a pay scale** from this century and quitting when you realize the cleaning crew in the building are making more than you are.

** - We literally made an entire website for that. And we literally called it salary (as in dot-com).

Every CWD (county welfare department) in California has a SIU (special investigations unit) made up of badge-and-gun-carryingcops. If you have evidence of fraud like trafficking of EBT cards, your CWD's SIU department would appreciate a call.

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

I triple-quaduple promise you that Paxton would WANT his video edited out to remove things which are true. But it will never happen because he is a) too much a coward and b) too busy doing securities frauds which you support because it goes along with your support for child rape.

Die in a fire, Child rape lover.