Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Any increase in quality? (Score 1) 35

I would rather a 3 year wait, and a show that's high quality than a 1 year wait for another round of trash. As a brit, I find it hilarious that you guys think 10 shows is a *short* season. I get that you used to have the year divided in two and basically 20-26 shows a season in the past, but it just doesn't make sense. You can't have a show that actually has a cohesive plot, that every episode advances, and also have 22 shows between major events happening.

Comment Re:Any increase in quality? (Score 2) 35

I'd generally agree with you, but not in the case of AppleTV. Their hit rate has been higher than most, and they haven't gone off cancelling things that people loved. For example, a recent survey said Apple's rate of a show being good, outstanding or exceptional was 50.8%, while Paramount's was 41%, Hulu's 40%, Max's 25%, Disney's 24%, Netflix's 20%, and Amazon's 14%. Their top hits have been:

- Ted Lasso
- Severance
- Silo
- Pluribus
- For All Mankind
- Slow Horses
- The Morning Show
- Murder Bot
- The Studio

every one of which is still running.

Comment Re: Ban or tax them (Score 1) 59

Whatâ(TM)s odd to me is that the Brits already have a solution to this, theyâ(TM)re just not deploying it. British councils *love* giving people 63 wheely bins for them to sort increasingly difficult to identify waste into. Why not just give out a container for people to put waste batteries/battery containing devices in? Alternatively, do the same as most councils do with glass, and put a big metal box in a fairly central location to contain them until the bin men come and empty it?

Comment Re: Meaningless statements? (Score 1) 219

Yeh, but heâ(TM)s also skipping right past âoecomputers can keep track of far more variables than humans.â Watch a Teslaâ(TM)s screen while itâ(TM)s in self drive and youâ(TM)ll observe it tracking 10s or even hundreds of cars exact position and speed. A tesla is already significantly superhuman in some regards. Where itâ(TM)s not is in decision making.

I mean, itâ(TM)s fine to make the argument that âoewe want as much redundancy as we can because weâ(TM)ve not found the place where more redundancy doesnâ(TM)t make things significantly betterâ, but thereâ(TM)s also a question of whether not perfect, but significantly better than human acceptable if it means that we donâ(TM)t have ugly, non aerodynamic bumps with lidar systems in them.

What theyre really arguing is âoeour system canâ(TM)t be made to perform well enough without lidar, so youâ(TM)d better accept the big bumpsâ.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images. -- Jean Cocteau

Working...