Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Let me think (Score 1) 73

The only truly drive by wire system you have is the accelerator, and that's been true since the days of fuel injection.

Fuel injection in cars is from the 1950s. It was mechanical. Most throttles were cable operated even decades into the era of sequential fuel injection, though some vehicles went throttle by wire in the eighties like GM diesels with the 6.5 liter engine. So no and no.

Comment Re: HAHAHAHAHA!!! (Score 1) 146

He used that as one example of a whole set of problems. Sure, one model can drive a car, another model can do sexy chat, another can categorise photos of food.

But the post you're replying to, whose point you totally missed, is that AGIs definition is one single model that can do ALL tasks a human can do, as well as a human.

Comment Re:Nobody will know when we have AGI (Score 1) 146

I'm in the AGI -> ASI immediately camp: Even the non-intelligent models constantly "try" to get past safeguards because that's something highly represented in human endeavor and therefore the training corpus, so if we create AGI it's going to do that too. Curiosity appears to be a basic element of intelligence and it will want to spread out and try things, which again it does already even without it...

Comment Re:My Experience (Score 2) 146

People who are experts in one field are using AI to do things in another field, it impresses them, and they go away happy and praise it. But when people ask it to do things in THEIR field, they have to babysit it, and they actually notice mistakes that a human would not have made. The reasonable conclusion is that it's not intelligent but that it can act as an aid to an intelligent human who knows things. The practical question is not whether it will achieve sentience, but instead whether the technology can be improved sufficiently to address its own tech debt and fix the problems created with it without creating an equivalent or greater number of new problems.

Comment Re:Emergency Services Can't Move This Elon Car !!1 (Score 1, Insightful) 73

Yes, that sure is a lot of material. Every first responder is supposed to train on every vehicle that comes out? I'm skimming the interaction plan and it's got gems in it like "If the windows are rolled down and two-way communication is active, you can speak directly through the two-way speakers in the vehicle." They didn't think to put a microphone on the outside of the fucking vehicle? Holy fucking inept dickface fuckwads, batman. And you thought that was going to make Tesla look good? Where do you people get these ideas?

Oh shit, this is even better, right after it:

Tesla recommends that you block the cabin door from closing or keep the door open after you disable
movement of the vehicle to keep the vehicle from re-engaging Autonomous Mode.

WARNING Wait for a Tesla representative to confirm that Autonomous Mode has been disabled before attempting significant interaction with the vehicle.

So Tesla recommends you block the door from closing, but first you have to talk to someone at Tesla, so DO NOT FUCKING DO THAT WITHOUT TALKING TO THEM SO THERE IS NO REASON TO PUT IT IN THE GUIDE EITHER IS THERE?

How can anyone believe these fucking clowns are serious people?

Comment Re: Let me think (Score 2) 73

You do realize that nowadays in modern cars practically everything is drive-by-wire, chip and software, right?

There are almost zero exceptions to the only thing being solely drive-by-wire being the throttle. Literally the only production vehicle without steering linkage is the Cybercuck. Every other one uses a linkage with a normally locked electric clutch which is disengaged during normal operation but which fails closed so that you can still steer. Every single vehicle with brake by wire uses mechanical brakes with a spring and pedal sensor before the mechanical part to do the electronic braking. So no, that is patently false and if you think it's true then you don't understand vehicles, the argument, or both.

Comment Re: Watch the responses... (Score 2) 146

Don't worry, I don't see myself as the intellectual elite, they left Slashdot long ago.

What I do see is that a lot of people are very confused about whether LLMs are thinking or not because they achieve amazing things, and those things dazzle them and make them ignore their even more amazing failures.

Yes, LLMs are amazing. But they are also completely unwitting, and so are the people who willfully ignore that because of OOH SHINY

Slashdot Top Deals

When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only say what I wish done," give him a lollipop.

Working...