Comment Re: Transitions (Score 1) 243
>For laptops, the answer to this kind of thing should be a standard space where a customer can specify what ports he wants...
Sounds almost like PCMCIA
Comment Re:What if? (Score 1) 48
There will, at a bare minimum, always be two "standard" Linux ones. One Debian-based and one RedHat-based. That said, a lot of the differences are just... derivatives of those two.
First RedHat - In the case of RedHat's relationship to Fedora and Centos Stream, those two are the upstream guinea pigs before things end up in RedHat Enterprise Linux. From there it ends up in Oracle Linux, Rocky, Alma, etc. The "RedHat" ecosystem is similar enough that if you learn one you've learned them all. The reason for the variants is the heart of it, RHEL, is not free (as in beer). But a bulk of the development and focus for this is done by paid RedHat engineers, even for the freely available Fedora and Centos Stream.
The other side of the coin is Debian based, which is the exact opposite of RHEL. Debian is the core, free in both senses of the word, and everything Debian-based is a subsidiary of it* (Ubuntu does enough of its own development that its kindof its own thing).
Because of the fully free nature of it, there will be tons of forks and branches of Debian.
Devuan for example came about because a group of people didn't like systemd and wanted to keep sysvinit.
Ubuntu came about to be a polished Desktop version of Debian, then branched into a Server variant, and now is largely parallel to Debian.
Mint came about because there still wasn't enough polish on Ubuntu or Debian for desktops, and thus there's versions based on both.
In theory, if RedHat went away, that entire side could die, and we'd be left with Debian. In practice RedHat will never die, thus there will always be two.
Comment Re:I'm fine with this. (Score 1) 48
For the desktop there's kindof already that.
Want easy, polished
Want easy, polished
Those four are the ones that work great out of the box, and easy to Google for things requiring tweaking, and have huge package libraries
Comment Wrong target to grow a spine against (Score 1) 88
It doesn't take spine to yell at corporations, it's easy to get elected yelling at corporations. What does take spine is:
1. building nuclear plants to make energy cheaper for all, and telling the locals and faux environmentalists to go f themselves when they try to stop it with timewaster court cases
2. building solar and wind against current Federal hamstringing
3. keeping natural gas around as a heat source despite hairbrained ideas of moving all cooking and heating to the grid
Comment School Choice Advocates Rejoice (Score 5, Insightful) 337
Anyone with money will be sending their kids to schools that have standards, so luckily this only affects poor San Franciscan families. Religious families also bypass this by sending their kids to religious schools.
Comment Re: Exploits (Score 1) 80
Dynamic discounts are only possible with this model - buying bread that will expire in 3 days versus 13 days for ~$1-2 less is a win-win. Customer gets a discount and the store gets to offload expiring goods before being forced to throw them out. Lots of people buy the thing with the furthest date out even if they plan on using it within the next week.
The current expiration dates are in inconsistent locations (even on the same product from the same brand) which is difficult for limited visibility people. Also consider how many times they do things like black text on red background. Pointing the phone at a QR code and having it read aloud solves this for these people.
And finally, I hope someday you do find out exactly what it's like to have limited visibility while trying to read things like labels, and someone replies to you with "sucks to be you".
Submission + - Journalist Writes About Discovering She'd Been Surveilled By TikTok (arstechnica.com)
An anonymous reader writes: One evening in late December last year, I received a cryptic phone call from a PR director at TikTok, the popular social media app. I’d written extensively about the company for the Financial Times, so we’d spoken before. But it was puzzling to hear from her just before the holidays, especially since I wasn’t working on anything related to the company at the time. The call lasted less than a minute. She wanted me to know, “as a courtesy,” that The New York Times had just published a story I ought to read. Confused by this unusual bespoke news alert, I asked why. But all she said was that it concerned an inquiry at ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, and that I should call her back once I’d read it.
The story claimed ByteDance employees accessed two reporters’ data through their TikTok accounts. Personal information, including their physical locations, had been used as part of an attempt to find the writers’ sources, after a series of damaging stories about ByteDance. According to the report, two employees in China and two in the US left the company following an internal investigation. In a staff memo, ByteDance’s chief executive lamented the incident as the “misconduct of a few individuals.” When I phoned the PR director back, she confirmed I was one of the journalists who had been surveilled. I put down my phone and wondered what it meant that a company I reported on had gone to such lengths to restrict my ability to do so. Over the following months, the episode became just one in a long series of scandals and crises that call into question what TikTok really is and whether the company has the world-dominating future that once seemed inevitable.
The story claimed ByteDance employees accessed two reporters’ data through their TikTok accounts. Personal information, including their physical locations, had been used as part of an attempt to find the writers’ sources, after a series of damaging stories about ByteDance. According to the report, two employees in China and two in the US left the company following an internal investigation. In a staff memo, ByteDance’s chief executive lamented the incident as the “misconduct of a few individuals.” When I phoned the PR director back, she confirmed I was one of the journalists who had been surveilled. I put down my phone and wondered what it meant that a company I reported on had gone to such lengths to restrict my ability to do so. Over the following months, the episode became just one in a long series of scandals and crises that call into question what TikTok really is and whether the company has the world-dominating future that once seemed inevitable.
Submission + - The Death of "Learn to Code"?
theodp writes: According to Google Trends, peak "Lean to Code" occurred in early 2019 when laid-off Buzzfeed and Huffpost journalists were taunted with the phrase on Twitter ("learn to code" has also been used in a serious vein by others, including President Biden). Now, Vox's Rani Molla reports that the "learn to code" advice for unemployed workers is likely to be less welcome than ever as software engineers made up the biggest portion of tech layoffs in 2023.
Molla writes, "The latest round of layoffs at Facebook parent company Meta is impacting workers in core technical roles like data scientists and software engineers — positions once thought to be beyond reproach. This represents a stark about-face for a company that, until recently, had been offering outrageous salaries and basically hoarding people in these highly sought-after technical positions. And now, as part of the company’s 'year of efficiency,' it’s letting some of them go. As Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg put it, 'We’re in a different world.'" Indeed. Encouraging kids to pursue CS careers in Code.org's viral 2013 launch video, Zuckerberg explained, "Our policy at Facebook is literally to hire as many talented engineers as we can find."
In Learning to Code Isn’t Enough, a new MIT Technology Review article, Joy Lisi Rankin reports on the long history of learn-to-code efforts, which date back to the 1960s. "Then as now," Lisi Rankin writes, "just learning to code is neither a pathway to a stable financial future for people from economically precarious backgrounds nor a panacea for the inadequacies of the educational system."
Molla writes, "The latest round of layoffs at Facebook parent company Meta is impacting workers in core technical roles like data scientists and software engineers — positions once thought to be beyond reproach. This represents a stark about-face for a company that, until recently, had been offering outrageous salaries and basically hoarding people in these highly sought-after technical positions. And now, as part of the company’s 'year of efficiency,' it’s letting some of them go. As Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg put it, 'We’re in a different world.'" Indeed. Encouraging kids to pursue CS careers in Code.org's viral 2013 launch video, Zuckerberg explained, "Our policy at Facebook is literally to hire as many talented engineers as we can find."
In Learning to Code Isn’t Enough, a new MIT Technology Review article, Joy Lisi Rankin reports on the long history of learn-to-code efforts, which date back to the 1960s. "Then as now," Lisi Rankin writes, "just learning to code is neither a pathway to a stable financial future for people from economically precarious backgrounds nor a panacea for the inadequacies of the educational system."
Submission + - EU Takes On United States, Asia With Chip Subsidy Plan (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader writes: The European Union on Tuesday agreed a 43 billion euro ($47 billion) plan for its semiconductor industry in an attempt to catch up with the United States and Asia and start a green industrial revolution. The EU Chips Act, proposed by the European Commission last year and confirmed by Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, aims to double the bloc's share of global chip output to 20% by 2030 and follows the U.S. CHIPS for America Act.
"We need chips to power digital and green transitions or healthcare systems," Commission Vice-President Margrethe Vestager said in a tweet. Since the announcement of its chips subsidies plan last year, the EU has already attracted more than 100 billion euros in public and private investments, an EU official said. "The critical piece of the equation which the EU will need to get right, as for the U.S., is how much of the supply chains supporting the industry can be moved to the EU and at what cost," said [Paul Triolo, a China and tech expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic & International Studies]. While the Commission had originally proposed funding only cutting-edge chip plants, EU governments and lawmakers have widened the scope to cover the whole value chain, including older chips and research and design facilities.
"We need chips to power digital and green transitions or healthcare systems," Commission Vice-President Margrethe Vestager said in a tweet. Since the announcement of its chips subsidies plan last year, the EU has already attracted more than 100 billion euros in public and private investments, an EU official said. "The critical piece of the equation which the EU will need to get right, as for the U.S., is how much of the supply chains supporting the industry can be moved to the EU and at what cost," said [Paul Triolo, a China and tech expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic & International Studies]. While the Commission had originally proposed funding only cutting-edge chip plants, EU governments and lawmakers have widened the scope to cover the whole value chain, including older chips and research and design facilities.
Submission + - The 4-Year Debate: Do Degree Requirements Still Matter for IT? (cio.com)
snydeq writes: Some companies have moved away from seeking only applicants with a college education, while others still want to see that bachelor's degree on IT worker's resumes. CIO.com's Mary Pratt reports on the debate among tech executives as to the value of a 4-year degree in today's tight talent market. 'Figures from the 2022 study The Emerging Degree Reset from The Burning Glass Institute quantify the trend, reporting that 46% of middle-skill and 31% of high-skill occupations experienced material degree resets between 2017 and 2019. Moreover, researchers calculated that 63% of those changes appear to be “‘structural resets’ representing a measured and potentially permanent shift in hiring practices” that could make an additional 1.4 million jobs open to workers without college degrees over the next five years.'
Comment Re:We had to share desks once ('98~'99) (Score 2) 109
You missed the point, he is saying desk sharing is superior to "hoteling". Hoteling is when there are desks that are basically first come first serve each day, you unpack your stuff at the desk and pack up at the end of the day, like you would in a hotel. The Google plan is more like a timeshare, two people sharing the same desk but on different days. If each employee gets their own set of locked drawers it could probably even work.
Comment Re: Also: Wrong question (Score 1) 428
It won't be a return to ICE, it would be worse - if the grid cannot handle demand and the typical alternate sources of energy (gasoline engines, natural gas) have been outlawed, the people will be so desperate for energy they will elect politicians who promise to stabilize the grid by building a fleet of coal power plants within a year (by suspending environmental regulations).
Comment Re:Not that I necessarily disagree, but (Score 1) 84
I look at it the other way - interacting via social media is so standard and easy, it is *better* than alternative ways such as a contact form or email. The two most useful are Twitter and Youtube - I follow all the government agencies and politicians that pertain to me, and can easily interact with them/their staff when needed. Initially that was all I had a Twitter account for.
As for Youtube - the NY Senate puts all their hearings on Youtube for anyone to watch. State agencies put out instructional / public safety videos on there. They could put those videos directly on their websites but it is inferior both in reach (people have to go to government agency websites) and cost (why re-invent a video service when one exists and costs taxpayers nothing to use).
Comment Re:Not that I necessarily disagree, but (Score 2) 84
There are many reasons for government on social media. Two categories for it:
-Government run accounts: get information out to people easily (transit agencies on delays, or there's new procedures for license renewal, parks/beaches closing due to weather, etc) and in a manner that allows for feedback; also users can report problems and it can get to someone in the agency easily - it's like a free no-frills ticketing system, with the added benefit of "customers" (taxpayers) self-grouping their issues under one thread, and when the official account replies other people having the issue know the agency is aware and won't bother calling/emailing about it, saving everyone time.
-Government employees as regular users: same reason an employee of any other company might, to solicit information from people more knowledgeable on a subject.
That said, TikTok is completely useless for all of that.
Comment Re:Just pretend it doesn't exist (Score 2) 249
IBM charges annual subscription fees to enable "dark" CPUs and memory in machines that have been purchased. Though they are flexible and allow the transfer of entitlement from one machine to another dynamically (useful if you're doing hardware maintenance, you can dial down the hardware you're shutting down to 0 and redistribute its activations to the other machines in your environment). You can pre-purchase temporary extra CPU activation days for cases where you temporarily find yourself hitting limits (let's say you're TicketMaster and Taylor Swift has just announced her first tour in four years). Their hypervisor software keeps track of all that for you and tells IBM all about what you're doing with the hardware.
In a weird way this is better than if they just allowed unfettered access to all of the hardware, because it imposes a sort of forced emergency capacity buffer that bean counters would be tempted to trim down. They can trim down on paper what they pay IBM, but you as an admin have the ability to essentially instantly teleport extra CPUs or TBs of memory into your machines when you need it the most.
Slashdot Top Deals
Organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon compounds. Biochemistry is the study of carbon compounds that crawl. -- Mike Adams
