Linux has been 'usable enough' for most people for a few years. Electron filled in the last mile problem and proton was the bridge that Wine by itself could never quite achieve. But there were still *just enough* things to make you need a CLI that made it appear the Linux is Hard (lets forget Microsoft's GUI for driver mgmt is not any easier really, but right-click-bros will say it is superior because it feels *more discoverable*, ignoring man pages etc).

Now with 2026 level LLM being able to fix almost any linux problem you throw at it, I think literally this will be the year, finally, of Linux on the Desktop, or at least the year more than just neckbeards and ultranerds have it on their laptop. Or, maybe better terminology, the year Microsoft finally fscked themselves with no backwards compatibility with even (well maintained) 10 year old laptops being good enough for 99% of the web.

Humans have never been able to accomplish this. LLM are trained off of human output.
 
Why would AI tools be able to do something that humans cannot do?
 
Agentic coding tools are definitely 10000% faster than a human and are about as accurate as a very experienced senior developer. But a senior dev is only as good as the specification they are writing to, just like with agentic coding tools. (note, I am talking about agents using frontier models like gpt codex and claude opus so if you use other lesser tools, YMMV as to how 'smart' and 'fast' your agentic coding tools are.)

I mean, pie in the sky and probably dumb idea aside (with todays power generation ability and server power requirements), but how would THIS get block by the need for an environmental review but that stupid orbital sky mirror shining onto the dark side of Earth NOT need an environmental review? Seems like this is just Satellite++??

Newer servers take longer than older servers. Its not x86 limited, a single tray in a GB300 NVL72 which is dual Grace takes ~8 minutes *just to POST*. The kernel only takes about 90 seconds. A storage server with multiple RAID cards could even take 10-15 minutes. More if you have multiple card with dozens or hundred+ drives.

I think we can answer this as "5 seconds to 30 minutes". Its so subjective. Servers of course take a long time to process firmware and load disks and network and process all sorts of things - the faster the kernel gets the more crap we have to intiialize since hardware continues to grow in complexity. Then the actual kernel loading takes another minute if you have 200+ visible CPU available. Add in 8x Nvidia blackwells and you've added another half a minute. Have a SAS controller with dozens of spindle disks? Might take some half a minute as well. Do you have infiniband with some dodgy bit in its firmware routine that takes 30 seconds to work itself out? Are you using clout init or something that needs to groom the network/storage on startup?
 
Oh wait were you talking about VM? How did you structure the PCIe roots and bridges? How many GPU did you pass through?
 
Or maybe you mean with PXE where with some controllers it can take an additional minute for them to figure out WTF the connection is and actually boot?
 
If you mean just kernel...5 seconds (my fast laptop) to 2 minutes (8x blackwell dual socket epycs with IB?)

There are quite a few companies that you don't see any sort of notice on because they do not want to store cookies on your computer unless you sign up for an account, then that sort of consent is implicit. Companies want to track you, store data on your PC, and keep it there for long times in exchange for letting you read some content someone posted years ago. The EU legislation requires them to make it explicit when they do this.
 
Advertising companies are forced to 'make it annoying' because their entire existing is to erode your privacy. The harder it is for you to click a toggle in the 600 plus analytic trackers some websites have (and i've seen some with this many), the more likely you are to just say "Screw this I want my content now" and just click accept.

Its not misinformation. The vast majority of websites you go to ARE NOT sites you have logged into. When creating an account you can easily opt in or opt out at the same time you're giving your own personal details. There are very few websites I go to (none in fact) where I click a preference and want it to be saved in a cookie where I have not logged in, and if I created an account I, again, can give consent when I create my account, and I *never get asked again*.
 
Of course you need to ask for consent. It does address third party cookies and tracking consent as well, except that most companies don't follow it, most websites list ~600 plus third parties, and the average user doesn't give two shits about their privacy.
 
Why the hell would I want a developer from a random website saving shit on my hard disk that I didn't explicitly consent to?? I know the internet has gotten shit but I can't believe people want to remove one of the few positive privacy things that have come out in recent years.

Information is the most valuable commodity in silicon valley at the moment and becoming more valuable every day... If ChatGPT provided information to google in a way that allows google to enhance their own competition to GPT, then it was indeed a leak.

Yeah was going to say, its hard enough for a *human* to get around in a car in a european city, between unmarked lanes and non-standard road sizes and sudden changes and super narrow one way streets through the medieval part of town, its not really a priority here...you can use a french city as a torture test for your self-driving if you want to see if it 'really works' I guess..

- Tesla is posting lower revenues than before his 'bad detour into politics' as you say. Though I would argue there is no bad detour into politics, just bad intentions, attitudes, and philosophies.
- Twitter aka X is posting lower profits than before the takeover and has seen users slowly leaving the platform.
- SpaceX is set to lose government contracts due to, as you put it, his 'bad detour into politics'.

No one is saying Musk didn't have innovative ideas in the past, but saying somehow he is a skilled businessman is somehow laughable in the year 2025. People change, their skills change, and their attitudes change. He is now a liability for any organization he is a part of.

Though I agree in principal, it could never be a $1.712 billion USD return since they have not developed these satellites with magic. There will be plenty of R&D and deliverables.. and after plenty of searching I could not find either a government source or whether it was a fixed cost contract, so it remains to be seen if this will be profitable, let alone even awarded to SpaceX, since all the articles say "appears to be" or "set to win" or something that is vague and not actually done and signed.
 
Also Blue Origin is getting contracts and there's questions if SpaceX will even go to the moon for NASA, so that $288M investment could actually end up *costing* Musk profit from his companies. It surely has affected the bottom line of Tesla for the worse.

The ironic part is that ASML is a dutch company. The most advanced lithography process is created in the Netherlands, but its just not economical to *make the chips* there.

Every human after the last generation could say the same thing, for thousands of years "life has been getting better than the previous generation".
 
The big difference now is most of the civilized, educated world is just that - civilized and educated, taught that life is different than it really is, disconnected from the death and disease of yesteryear, taught that life is 'fair' and people are treated fairly, that people care.
 
And, again, you missed a big difference - the word "disconnected". When in the past life was hard I had a village or community rally around me. That doesn't happen for most people today outside of some small village types and religions. Many, many, many people live their quiet lives of desperation *completely* disconnected from reality, from care, from touch. THAT is new, and if you don't think it is, you haven't really studied history. Did people have shit disease that made life miserable with no medicine and no hope in previous generations? OF COURSE but you had hope and prayer and community. MOST (not all) do NOT have this today. If you think they do, *you* are the one who is disconnected from the reality of modern life for most of modern humanity.

I am not looking only at my part of the job - again, I *actually* worked there on the team that did this. Let me reiterate - the first generation macintosh to use an x86 chip was a Mac Pro workstation with 2 processors, designed and built entirely inside VSD by ~30 people. The look and feel, specs, and design all came from Apple. The actual server board used was more or less "off the shelf" with some slight modifications for multi gfx support and EFI only bios - it wasn't until the 3rd gen of x86 designs that apple took this in house and stopped using a BTX layout. There was no tech marketing, no benchmarking teams, no one testing games or lots of SAS RAID cards in this thing, no in house design or UX 'experience' psych tests....
 
Want to include the teams that built the xeon processor and the intel networking chipset and the pre-release chip/board testers and etc? Ok sure its a *LOT* more, but none of them signed an NDA and worked in the closed secure lab that had this board and case, but at that point you may as well include Linus Torvalds since we used Linux on large parts of the pre-release validation.

The world is more broken and disconnected than ever before. There's less human interaction, community, and peace than ever before. There's more social pressure to be a certain way, to act a certain way. There's less ability and knowledge to feed yourself and the factory produced foods are more expensive than ever. Human work is being devalued and we're losing the battle against the oligarchs.
 
I'm sure a small percentage are trollers who want to see how GPT responds to talk about suicide but 1 million *in a week* are signs to me of societal illness, if you didn't just need to look at the newspapers to see this. Even if they are just trolling....suicide is a strange thing to try and troll a chatterbot with, fixating on this topic and talking about it, even as a joke, are subconscious signs of struggle.