to fouling up the AI Apocalypse Prevention Act...

You will get an AI toaster and you will like it!

(Unless the damned bubble pops)

on my PC. I can't see it in Task Manager, but start getting "out of memory" errors after a couple of weeks and have to reboot. Restarting Firefox alone is insufficient to clear it. I suspect it has something to do with the graphics card rather than primary RAM, and could be co-caused with some other app.

Sorry, I made a boo boo.

They're hard to find though, because the interstellar medium of hydrogen and helium gas between the stars absorbs ultraviolet light.

It's a good thing hydrogen does that because our hydrogen atmosphere keeps us from getting big-time sun-burn.

Some place between sometimes and often - I'm not here to argue that - researchers are the first to discover.

But it's also almost meaningless to just go, "I'm such an amazing realist, the worst case happens every time."

That's not really being realist. That's just you not knowing actual things, and having an emotion.

Considering my LG TV just updated last week with a "no class action lawsuit" T&C clause, I'm pretty sure what they're saying is "yeah, we're screwing you, but we're hoping you accept these new T&C before you join a class."

I like my LG stuff. I'll just keep the TVs not connected to the internet, and behind AppleTVs. And, as an added bonus, I don't get LG's commercials.
Now if Apple starts doing shady shit like this I'll be truly screwed, but we're not there. Yet.

A betting pool in which big-tech company will finally pop the bubble?

Maybe there is an upper practical limit to how much can be mined out of the training data? Most newer stuff is corrupted with AI generated results creating problems that some compare to inbreeding.

How about Unidentified Flying Force?

Okay, but "religiousist" isn't a real word. My first boss always told me not to complain without first forming an alternative plan.

AK47's

I'll give you credit. You're great at picking sound bytes and quotes absent context to fake your point. Seems like you may be gunning for a FOX, Newsmax, or OAN "fact checker" in the future.

The Harvard lawsuit is still being adjudicated in the courts and proves nothing. It is an currently just an allegation at this point, which comes back to my previously, "guilty until proven innocent" comment. Thanks for helping to reinforce that point.

The FCC's broadcast license has historically been a technicality focused on making sure the equipment does not cause interference. But sure, in your world that means, "we don't like you, so we can take it away because.... reasons!" Show a single instance, prior to Trump, of the FCC doing what they are attempting now.

Just because you don't like the concept of DEI does not make it unlawful nor discriminatory. In fact, the proper venue for that is first a court, and if a court did happen to agree, a potential license review might be justified. This is "guilt until proven innocent", and it's solely done because the Orangeutan doesn't like their content, which is a blatant first amendment violation.