Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Software playbook (Score 3, Informative) 58

It costs next to nothing to bring on a new customer since there's no widget to make and ship.

Growing marketshare is *the* priority. Give it away for free. Pay people to use it if you must.

Then once they're hooked, start charging licensing fees. Just a little. More for bigger customers. Maybe keep a free tier for personal use. A little times a huge userbase is enormous cashflow for a little bit of nre.

It's great cuz the customer supplies his own platform, pays for training his own people, and even pays for the electricity to run your product on premises.

Now about this building full of expensive and power-hungry silicon needed to deliver the ai hotness...

Comment Re: That's nice (Score 1) 74

If I ran any kind of business, I'd have my money in various kinds of places that balanced risk, return, and liquidity against my perceived need for keeping the lights on, paying vendors, and and anticipated revenue. Same as everyone.

I wouldn't operate like I had a fountain of money nor do I believe I would be perceived as having one.

Comment That's nice (Score 0, Insightful) 74

Hospitals don't have a fountain of money. They purchase malpractice insurance on behalf of their providers and the premiums for that insurance pay for these jury awards.

Insurance companies don't print their own money either. They redistribute the costs of these payouts over their risk pool. And those premium hikes is one of several reasons why your emergency room visit costs 10k if you had to pay for it out of pocket.

The other reason it costs 10k is that enough of these lawsuits and jury awards have forced hospitals into doing medically unnecessary (but expensive) tests for everyone, rather than coming up with some kind of cost-conscious criteria, to cover their bases and their asses so they don't get sued.

Say it with me now: tort reform. The lawyers don't like it, which is how you can tell it's a good idea.

Comment Re: Somebody deserves a Medal. (Score 0) 49

Yes, and in general it's just a lot easier when the whole world, including your would-be adversaries, use technical standards, software, and electronics that your own private sector sells to them.

A corollary is that it's less easy when your would-be adversary makes moves to undercut your industry and/or try to assert their own dominance in any such domain. One might even read it as a strategic prelude to conflict.

Comment Re: You can bet (Score 1) 44

I remember being a kid in the 90s and watching scare stories on the TV about other kids in the 90s who were so addicted to the computers they were writing software and making their own websites! As kids!

I wasn't one of those kids. I didn't LearnToCode until college. But I was good friends with one of those kids while in college. He's worth at least 10 or 20 times more than me now.

And the other millenial parents on my street are grabbing up spots at after school coding classes for their elementary school aged kids.

Not that I think it's gonna go anywhere. Unless your kid is significantly smarter than your average bear, coding won't stick until high school at the earliest. But I'm sure there were fads in the 90s that my parents were too poor to pay for that I just wasn't aware of that also went nowhere but elicited equally strong visceral reactions over what turned out to be nothing.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain

Working...