So I was able to create my very long, secure, easy to remember password. Yay.
So I was able to create my very long, secure, easy to remember password. Yay.
We use iPad Minis in school. Hundreds of them.
There's an app that views my home CCTV camera on iPad. I install it, purely to make the iPad "do something" during the course of the day. The others allocated to the IT department are in cupboards and drawers, uncharged and unused.
So I put my camera up on my iPad and use it as remote CCTV for my house while I'm at work.
Every 8 hours or so, it crashes the iPad back to black screen, Apple logo, progress bar, back into lock-screen.
Sure, it's a misbehaving app. Sure it's probably a memory leak or similar. But it takes out the entire machine, with alarming regularity - and it's not the only time that happens, it just happens to trigger it more reliably than other things.
And yet this iPad is on the latest iOS within minutes of it happening (it's only other purpose is to see what iOS 9.3 or whatever broke this time around).
Yes, I've switched iPads. But the students still say that similar things happen to theirs, sometimes in the middle of lessons. That's just *shite* for anything running in the 21st Century and not doing anything more difficult than viewing a video stream off the Internet.
Until the dolls literally spray genuine, authentic baby shit and vomit on you in the middle of the night, they are going to be inadequate to the task of dissuading girls from wanting to make babies.
If you can't actually fill them with a truly realistic substitute for unwanted infant fluids, they're worthless.
Because pressing the wrong buttons makes screens crack, batteries explode, device just turn off, touchscreens to wear (sometimes to the point of vertical / horizontal lines on the screen), etc. etc. etc.? Yeah, okay.
Nobody else needs a DSLR, so this is a complete non-problem.
How does this excuse having a terrible interface?
You only think it's terrible because you don't need what it does. If you did, then you would think it's a great interface, because it does what you need. This is how I can tell you don't need a DSLR. You need a simplified, Fisher-Price camera. Sometimes those are great, and I have one. When I am just taking snapshots, that's what I use, because it is simple and good and small and light. I don't use the DSLR at all unless I need something it's got that the super zoom doesn't, like RAW. It doesn't have any more lens.
Because I need to be able to change the setting quickly, and also while holding the camera with both hands.
So make the settings that need to be changed fast easy to change fast.
Yes, that's what they have done. You're just seeing settings you don't need to change and thinking about how inconvenient all those settings are for you, because you think the universe revolves around your balls.
There are a lot of features you could not possibly change faster than the time it takes to pull out a cell phone that given that they are buried in a menu somewhere.
You are completely incorrect. No camera has more than three or four levels of menus and I can navigate a menu structure like that much faster than I can get my phone out of my pocket. I may not have a spare hand at all, so the phone might not be an option at all. I can work my phone menus with one hand. I cannot work the phone and the camera at the same time with one hand.
Your solutions are dumb because they make the situation more complicated. All cameras will eventually have fancy-pants multitouch displays and then there will be absolutely no benefit whatsoever to phone interfaces. In the interim, that kind of functionality is of use only to a subset of users. If a brand did what you describe then the professionals would go elsewhere and the company would rapidly gain a reputation for making toys and then go away.
Having no children is also sociopathic - because there would be no next generation of a society.
That would be true only if you couldn't count on other people having children. I'm not buying into eugenics arguments either; stupid people have smart kids and vice versa. It looks like intelligence is more environment than genetics. We need some people to breed. We should (as a species) stop being shit to women who don't breed, so that the ones who really want to (and preferably those who are good at it) can make babies. People doing a shit job of making babies and subsequently doing a shit job of raising them is why we can't have nice things.
Yeah, we don't do things like dig huge holes under our homes,
With a backhoe. Ever used a backhoe? It makes digging a five foot trench trivial.
install piping that must be highly corrosion resistant,
You may have heard of this stuff called plastic.
and fight the continuous buildup of mold and other biological growths.
It's a non-issue due to constant air movement. But I guess you're smarter than the various people who are actually doing this already.
Yikes! That's a wake up call right there. Always envisioned right-wing reactionary militants as the catalyzing agent for population reduction wars. Just goes to show that any authoritarian agents with power-centric ideologies they value above the sanctity of human life are dangerous as fuck.
You don't get it even slightly, do you? It's going to be the right-wingers who kill you for threatening the environment. Only complete fucking morons think that AGW is invented. The wealthy know that it's real. That's why, for example, Trump is concerned about climate change threatening his golf course. One of the final acts of the Bush administration was to formally acknowledge AGW. The left will keep trying to keep everyone alive, fed, and the like right up until the planet becomes unlivable. The wealthy, on the other hand, have no compunctions about throwing you into the log chipper as the first step on the way to becoming soylent green.
So, how much am I going to pay for a 512GB M.2? And does it have 4 lanes?
The situation in most of the USA is that it's been done using the worst possible mixture of laissez-fair capitalism and central planning. Vast amounts of taxpayer money have been poured into the infrastructure, yet that infrastructure is owned by a few companies and they have geographical monopolies and are now owned by their customers, so have no incentive to improve it. Oh, and regulator capture means that it's actually illegal to fix the problem in a lot of places. You can provide an incentive in several ways:
Alas, it's a shame that it doesn't mean anything. The point here is that the Earth has undergone many shifts in its climate, sometimes in a startlingly short period of time
Except that the difference in temperature between the peak of the Medieval Warm Period and the bottom of the Little Ice Age were significantly smaller than the difference between the current temperature and the bottom of the Little Ice Age. The last time we saw an increase in temperature equivalent to the last 200 years it was over a period of tens of thousands of years.
Go and read a news story about an area of science that you know about and compare it to what the original research actually claimed. Now realise that press reports about climate change are no more accurate than that and go and read some of the papers. The models have been consistently refined for the last century, but the predictions are refinements (typically about specific local conditions and timescales), not complete reversals. Each year, there are more measurements that provide more evidence to support the core parts of the models.
Oh, and I don't think the words objectivist or dualistic mean what you think they mean. You can't discard evidence simply by throwing random words into a discussion.
Like I'm going to actually use a link to PSN in an article about how insecure my PSN account is...
With a multiuser, multitasking OS you can have 25 different unrelated processes running on something with 25 cores. Or you could have 25 threads in a dataflow arrangement where each is a consumer of what the last just produced. Or you could go over the members of an array or matrix 25 members at a time with the same transformation. Some things are serial, but there are plenty of ways more cores can actually be used.
"Rescue teams searching for earthquake survivors in central Italy"
Are you insane? Or just really, really, really stupid?
Don't answer, because I will not be reading responses from someone so clearly an idiot - and by now someone who has shown they work very, very hard at staying an idiot.
Our business is run on trust. We trust you will pay in advance.