Comment Re:data || GTFO (Score 1) 79
Remember when Microsoft wrote a storage driver for MS SQL Server? And how it interacted with the 'native' MS Server driver?
Remember when Microsoft wrote a storage driver for MS SQL Server? And how it interacted with the 'native' MS Server driver?
I'm reminded of the arguments had over SCSI RAID controllers, and turning off read-after-write-verify... Since, at the time, SCSI drives did RAWV in hardware, that was redundant on the controller. And in software.
This came to a head, for me, when I queried a Novell Labs fellow about the 'non-media defects' I saw deactivating SCSI drives on servers. They finally gave in and explained, it was a controller defect. Which I challenged. And they finally stated that a drive hardware write error (RAWV fail) would report as 'non-media' because the intervening RAID controller gave it back as a controller error, which was usually wrong, but that was the way it worked. And since SMART didn't exactly work on SCIS, and log sense was not implemented in most RAID controllers, we had minimally useful diagnostics. So I would keep track of the drives that elicited 'non-media defect' messages, and schedule them for replacement.
It's almost a pleasure to read discussions about RAM doublers, etc., and no one remembers when these were bits of software that actually did not do anything useful at all. Ah, the 80s.
Do what you want way up there. The swing between summer and winter amount of sunlight is drastic. However, down here? The change makes it much worse. It takes months just to get back to baseline after the clocks change. I just donâ(TM)t care, either pick one or just move the clocks 30 minutes one last time and keep it there. why has no one thought of this? Did the Canadiens study that? Move the clocks by 30 minutes and keep them there.
The RCMP puts out posts on Facebook, about keeping kids safe, and understanding your kids cyber habits. One thing they don't openly point out, Carney, our disgraced Prime minster, is a child / teenager sexual enthusiast. Who do we really have to keep our kids safe from? We have to keep them safe from the government, who is trying to pass bills that force the collection of child exploitation material.
Part B:
Why does that matter? Carney was friends with Epstein, they're in photos together. Epstein died, cutting off Carney from his favourite type of material, and now, his party is forcing that collection through legal means. Effectively, Carney is just building a CSAM spank bank with government assistance. Now, that's objective, since if you wanted to keep kids safe, you'd pass bills to increase / ramp up cybersecurity, not become the cyber stocker.
The entire point of that was to mention he's doing the opposite of keeping kids safe, and collecting data he should be trying to distance from. In a very rough overview, and I'm not a lawyer or legal professional, but I do watch legal review, Carney is trying to legislate CSAM collection, why? C-8, C-22, C34, and C-36, they don't require Epstein for Carney to be guilty of what I'm calling him out on. I don't believe all the photos are AI generated or AI altered, I think I've clear on that, but either way, he's still in a world of trouble from what his party is doing. That's not false information, I've listed the four extremely problematic bills, so if the RCMP is going to make posts on Social Media about keeping kids safe, why are they not calling out the Liberals?
If Miranda rights were written a little like the Second Amendment, police would indeed have a PD in house for this. But even the 2nd Amendment, despite 'shall not...', is regularly sidestepped. Bear in mind, though, that in many big cities the schools are teaching that police are the enemy. They fail, however, to follow that up with 0) know your rights, and 1) STAY OUT OF TROUBLE. But to make big city school systems are cheating students out of a future. It's criminal.
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. -- Niels Bohr