I wish a bunch of people like this would come together, and see how much of their money it would take to free the rights to Star Trek once and for all. The simple fact that "fan films" are approaching such a level that the studios are now reacting negatively to them, is proof positive that those studios can no longer be trusted to carry on the franchise.
And if you're in the downtown San Jose area, you tend to notice the local impact of Woz a lot more. There's a street named after him, and he's made contributions to some community places for children.
It seemed like every little town blocking off areas for their own special little "Super Bowl Thing" caused *far* more disruption to daily life in the area than the actual Super Bowl itself. Overall traffic patterns barely budged. If anything, it was less busy than normal, because everyone stayed home to avoid the perceived Super Bowl traffic.
Actually, there is feedback that it has been disabled. The car makes a chime noise, and there are dash indicators.
Of course a driver oblivious enough to let a car drive into a guardrail is also likely oblivious enough to ignore said feedback.
Huh? Before firing, why would it be at a 15,000 orbital velocity and not geosynchronous?
Because a straight vertical line from directly overhead is the fastest delivery route.
Missile silos are hard to pre-emptively destroy. A space plane on the other hand...
These companies are not going to singlehandedly change the makeup of tech (or even just high paid) workers in the United States, no matter how much they try (or are put under political pressure to do so). And I think that it is rather disingenuous / politically correct of them to simply market that they will do it because it's fashionable to say they will. Addressing this problem is deeper and requires more of the desired target segments to go into these fields to be available to apply to the positions to start with. Which is a much more difficult challenge that most of the advocates for such policies actually don't even want to put in the effort to do themselves.
I do often feel that if these companies actually did manage to change the makeup of tech workers among their own ranks, to reflect what everyone wants their stats to look like, we'll get into a different kind of bizzaro world. One where a handful of big-name tech companies have *all* of the desired diversity, and the rest of the industry is *entirely* 100% non-diverse. The supply-side problem really does feel that bad.
Does this problem need to be addressed? Yes. Is it right to point blame at companies so far down the pipeline for it? I'm not so sure.
Ah, playing the old "I have kids so I'm special" card.
Look it's simple, if you can't control your kids, they shouldn't be out in public.
Ah, playing the new "I don't have kids, so I'm better than you" card.
I guess in your world, everyone who has kids will be required to stay under house arrest until their kids are above some pre-determined age? Or should everyone be required to send their kids to a detention facility so they can go about their daily lives without giving you something to complain about?
Why is everybody's kneejerk reaction to blame the parent?
Because no one doing the blaming actually has children, or remembers what its like to have small children, or has ever actually had to chase a toddler around.
You are missing the step where compact laptops became cost competitive and powerful enough that they weren't a burden to travel with. This made them an extra device for many people.
There was a time when everyone got these unwieldy and clunky laptops, that turned out to be as portable as a desktop under everyday circumstances. So when they needed something actually portable, they went out and got netbooks. Then later, as netbooks went out of style and the iPad was all the rage, they went out and got tablets.
But today, if you're lucky enough to have a laptop that's actually conveniently portable, a tablet doesn't seem to have much use anymore. A good smartphone has the advantage of being on your person all the time. And a good laptop can basically do anything. So what exactly do I need a tablet for? Its not going to be on my person as regularly as a smartphone, and its not going to be as capable as a laptop (that's now similar enough in size/weight).
That being said, there do seem to be a lot of older (non-computer) people who have somehow replaced nearly all of their "outside the office" computer use with iPads.
I'm pretty sure he had to either machine the rotors down or replace the rotors for that $700 price. That is not that unreasonable of a price for new rotors if the shop was doing the work, depending on the car.
There are certain cases where a fuel injector will need cleaning - but that usually implies that the driver barely uses the car and thus does get build-up that never gets flushed away.
It isn't usually cheaper to lease a car every 2 years. I didn't do any work myself besides replacing headlamps and turn signal lights, and I've had the car for over 11 years now, and after the cost of maintenance, i'd had spent a lot more for a lease of the same car. But sorry for ruining your smugness.
3) Looks like the driver didn't do anything beyond trust that the system wouldn't do something completely fucking stupid that the most primitive collision detection algorithm could have avoided.
Not so fast here... What appears to have happened, is this driver found a corner-case that a collision detection system actually may not have been designed to detect. Even the maker of the sensor package Tesla uses has come out to support this. (While mentioning that their next generation system will be capable.)
Of course I have seen a lot of tractor trailers out here that now have these side-fairing things installed to improve aerodynamics, which would likely have also improved detection in cases like this. But obviously, no such equipment was on the truck involved in this collision.
I keep wondering if some billionaire Star Trek fans should settle this argument once and for all, by paying CBS/Paramount enough money to release the rights.
After all, I think its been established that the official studios can no longer be trusted to produce Star Trek content, and many fans feel as though Star Trek is too important to be left to the official studios.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.