If the MRI reports are mixed between patients due to hacks, it could lead to incorrect medical decisions. You still want some level of security. While MRI don't expose you to radiation, CT and xray machines do, and that requires proper security.

No. The point is that CCS and NACS use the same protocol, they are just different connectors, and interchangeable with cheap passive adapters. The OP thinks it's a deal breaker to have to use a CCS to NACS adapter. That strikes me as odd. There are still plenty of chargers with only CCS or only NACS connectors, so it's best if you buy and carry such an adapter if you are using public chargers, regardless of what type of connector your car has.

Chademo is different in that no simple passive adapter will help you. Apparently, active adapters do exist now. That is a recent development. They cost a lot more. They max out at 50 kW, even though some Nissan Leafs have been made that can use up to 100 kW. There seems to be concerns with safety certification for these adapters, also. That is quite a different situation than having to use a passive adapter.

The Mythos model would have already been trained on the previous fixes, so that wouldn't be a meaningful test either.

Chademo is a totally different protocol, not just a different connector.

No. They are both terrible.

Seems like maybe not the best metrics.

It will certainly force users/providers/administrator to review their patching processes, and velocity.

Nah. It was Kash Patel.

I would love it if I could ask the AI a question about the RPC I'm playing and have it give me an answer in a small pop-up. Today, I need to switch to the Xbox Edge browser, which sucks on console.

But the contractor who created Clippy isn't.

Yes, but it involves Skynet, and a Terminator traveling back in time to kill Clippy.

There are still places without any cell service in the US. Unlike for landlines, the government does not mandate that cell service must be available at your address.

It does not work without a human prompt. It's a productivity tool. A very helpful one. Until you run out of quota on Anthropic. I have been alternating between Claude code on the $20 plan and Claude code with qwen3.6 locally. Much slower locally, but still faster than what I would be able to write and test alone without the tool.

Not for FDIC-insured funds.

Surely this is a loss-leader. Expect the rug to be pulled.

It was just a typo. I didn't even see it. Vision issues.