I know GDPR article 27 doesn't let companies outside the EU sell to customers in the EU or collect any personal data from viewers in the EU without paying a ton of money per year to a representative service.
And to answer your question: The best way is to ask your users.
Henry Ford's prospective customers said they wanted a faster horse. And if you ask your users how often you should be asking your users for feedback, they'll probably say never because asking interrupts their immediate task.
What's the GDPR-compliant way to inform users that people who decline to participate in a user survey risk losing access to features?
"BMV" in the US state of Indiana means "Bureau of Motor Vehicles". I don't know whether any other jurisdictions use that term.
Not even remotely true if we succeed in reducing the CAFE standards
All of the automakers were ready, willing, and able to meet the emissions regulations well ahead of schedule
Emissions and CAFE are separate standards. CAFE relates to fuel economy. US automakers have been making light trucks instead of cars to exploit the looser CAFE standards on trucks. It's why Ford has lost its focus since April 2018.
If they could make money from paywalls, they'd have more paywalls.
Newspapers and Facebook are heading that way with "pay or consent" schemes in GDPR territories.
And many of us would welcome paywalls as a replacement for ads anyway.
I've noticed a lot of comments to Slashdot articles stating that they didn't read the featured article on account of having to buy a month's subscription just to read one article.
Third, they explicitly list purposes like "required market analysis" and similar things that are certainly not required to provide the service to you.
What's the privacy-respecting way to determine demand among users for continuing to maintain a particular feature of a website or web application?
GNOME Web (codename Epiphany), the default web browser of the GNOME desktop environment, uses Apple WebKit. I've seen Apple fans recommend it as a proxy for testing a hobbyist website in macOS without having to buy a $999 MacBook.
Under your preference, what would be the appropriate venue for public service announcements or for advertising product review publications?
Because the major newspapers with "Times" in their name are paywalled, and The Guardian has publicly committed not to require a paid subscription.
But recent years I often met people who said "I can not read a whole book"
Would this be more honest? "I enjoy reading short stories. However, given my life circumstance, a novella about as long as H. G. Wells's The Time Machine is the upper limit before work or household interruptions inevitably break my concentration."
This will lead to two things: more paywalls to replace the forgone ad revenue, and more service providers discontinuing service in Vietnam.
How would you recommend to fund writing and hosting a website if the website operator cannot sell "behavioral" ad impressions targeted to the individual viewer's inferred interests? I'm aware that it's possible to target an impression to the context of the document in which the ad appears. This is called "contextual" ad placement. However, advertisers are willing to pay three times as much for a behavioral impression than for an contextual impression. Banning publishers from selling behavioral impressions would lead to more countdown interstitials, more paywalls, and more websites disappearing from the Internet when their operators run out of money.
the companies still claim some cookies would be 'required' and therefore cannot be deselected
I fail to imagine how one might store which cookies the user has deselected, other than in a cookie that cannot be deselected.
I haven't read this bill. But if it's remotely like the right of erasure pursuant to the European Union's GDPR, it does not apply to data that a data broker is required by law to retain.
Last I checked, it was a crime in Slashdot's home country to make children's sleepwear out of cotton or other flammable fabrics.
If I were a grave-digger or even a hangman, there are some people I could work for with a great deal of enjoyment. -- Douglas Jerrold
