Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:alito barrett and thomas dissent (Score 2, Interesting) 67

On this and the birthright citizenship ruling it is astounding that any of the justices would have dissented. This is clear-cut constitutional law. The fact that Roberts is willing to throw out a hundred years of precedent on several matters is deeply concerning. It really shows the constitution, the rule of law, the stability of precedent are all just recommendations, conveniences when they serve a political purpose. Otherwise they can be cast aside. Because, why not? It's so liberating to be free from precedent and the constitution. I guess they're not familiar with the whole joojooflop situation where finally being free from the norms that kept you down means losing the entire civilization. It's a bit surreal to even being talking about this.

Comment Re:So what does that mean? (Score 4, Insightful) 56

In truth niether. China isn't that good yet but moving quickly. Anthropic is still at the top of the game for now but won't be there forever and they insist on keeping the models locked up and proprietary. Sooner it later the more open models will win. And hopefully we'll finally get accessible hardware to run them locally.

Comment Re:Check the usual return flow (Score 1) 242

Oh wow. What a great excuse! The corruption under the current president is at a scale you've never before seen. For example, the president's son-in-law is peddling influence and making money from his official connections on a scale that make Hunter Biden look positively angelic.

Besides that, are you really excusing your champion's corruption because of smaller-scale, previous corruption? Surely you would condemn all corruption and desire to shine a light on it? Or is corruption not an issue when it's your man and your policies being enacted?

Comment Re:Hot or cold? Make your minds up! (Score 1) 163

Hmm. Have you been to Europe? While New Orleans certainly has old buildings, it's nothing like European old buildings and homes many of which were build hundreds of years ago in a cooler climate. These buildings were never designed to accommodate forced air heating, let alone A/C air handlers. It's going to require some very interesting engineering to bring mass cooling to Europe to existing structures. I'm sure it can be done, of course. Where there's a bill there's a way.

Which of course brings us to a core issue of climate change. The world's poorest people, who contributed the least to CO2 emissions, will bear the most cost to adapt.

Comment Re:Gambling (Score 1) 14

It definitely is. Every dollar a person makes on such a site comes from a dollar lost by another guy. And the numbers are staggering. Like a billion dollars. And they way they are set up, those who are already rich can set things up so that they make even more money from much poorer people. The more money you have to play with, the easier it is to win on the predictions gambling sites (not to mention cheat with insider knowledge). Fantastic video on this from a young lady named Dee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... Highly recommend for anyone who wants to know how this scam works. 70% of the takings go to 0.1% of the players (who also happen to be the ones with the most money to start with).

At least on the stock market, there is such thing as growth from companies making money, paying dividends, etc.

I'm not at all surprised to see Zuckerberg getting in on this. It's not enough to addict the world to social media and sell their privacy. He wants every last dollar they have. It's really quite evil.

Comment Re:Give my my SysVInit (Score 1) 170

Yes you absolutely can do it for some modules. For example, systemd-timesyncd can be removed and ntpd or chrony installed instead if you need more functionality than just simple client time syncing, such as when you need your own time source as well as syncing.

Likewise systemd-resolved is often left out and a caching local DNS server can be used instead, or left out entirely.

And I very well could remove systemd-networkd and systemd-container since I don't use containers, flatpak, or kvm.

Can I remove others? Possibly, but there's not a lot of reason to do so. These modules serve valid purposes and address actual technical shortcomings we had before, such as process cleanup which was often a problem before systemd-pam.

Shrug. It's not a boogeyman. No one's out to get you. It's not a government plot. There are many valid reasons why systemd has become a core Linux component. There are plenty of distros (and operating systems) that eschew systemd if you don't want or need features like containers and KDE or Gnome, etc.

that can run your old classic desktop environments like you always used to.

Slashdot Top Deals

I put up my thumb... and it blotted out the planet Earth. -- Neil Armstrong

Working...