I would argue this point. This was a bug in the current public releases of PHP. It hit web sites that were diligently maintained, not just those that were set up once and never maintained.

And, really, while you may not like that most of them don't give back to PHP or Apache or whoever... if that were meant to be a requirement, it could've been built into the various open-source licenses from the get-go.

What do you mean? He seems hell-bent on having his name immediately above Kennedy's...

Can you imagine riding to the moon on a Russian spacecraft? Your blood pressure would be through the roof the entire time (and that's a best case scenario).

And pay everyone $5K! ... if his side, the side of fiscal responsibility*, wins.

*hey I actually managed to type that with a straight face

They're announcing now because they want to at least get a first round of that sweet, sweet investor (and probably government) cash coming their way ASAP! Who knows if they'll still have a "money is no object" buyer in a couple years?

I don't think I have ever had or have any device that does ethernet over HDMI.

>"5. Mandatory network connections. TV won't work unless it is connected to the internet. "

That is the only problematic one.

My TV, like all the previous ones, is a display. It is connected to a single HDMI cable. I don't give a F about anything else. I don't use audio, I never connect network, or anything else.

I simply won't buy a TV that requires a network connection (or includes one inside out of my control). I assume many others would feel the same. And if this starts to be a thing, I will do my best to educate everyone I know why it matters and why they shouldn't buy that model/brand.

My Samsung TV is a couple years old, but it has the option of defaulting to the last known input - bypassing their launch screen completely. If you use an external device like an Apple TV or Roku, you'll pretty much never have to see the Samsung screen again.

Cry me a river.

Comcast/Spectrum just bought Cox. And my Cox bill is already over $200 a month for BASIC cable, downsampled to just 720p, at a low bitrate, and 300Mbs down internet for one person. And that is with their best "loyalty" discounts. So yeah, I am right on the edge of dropping cableTV, especially since the only reason I have it is because of love TiVo. TiVo is essentially dead (I still have service, but they don't sell boxes anymore). Cable TV has always been very hostile to cablecard devices, and they keep hiking prices more and more for worse service and content. It won't be long now before it goes bye-bye for me as well.

Coax/cable modems really suck when it comes to reliability. So yeah, that "fiber to home" part they are missing really does matter now. Crap, even if it was Ethernet from the pole to my house that would be much better. Numerous times I have had to get them out here, with great difficulty, to fix their crap on the poles so I can get a proper signal. Amplifier issues, water in their equipment, improper signal balancing, interference from stuff in other homes ruining things, etc.

>"It may just be me but I don't want ANYTHING to do with Elon Musk. "

It isn't just you. If you want to be an ideologue, that is your right as a consumer. And that does have power. Me, I prefer to look at what is being offered and decide if it is a service/product I need/want/like. Generally, more competition in this market would be a good thing. I have no great love of any of the current carriers. T-Mobile was my favorite for a very long time, but they have been kinda sliding downhill now.

Of course with UTF one can come up with fake sites whose URLs are visually indistinguishable from the real site.

That's one nice thing about a password manager (if the site in question requires authentication)... it doesn't fall for that.

I live in a semi-rural area, which may be why I get good (non-oversubscribed) Comcast service right now. My wife is from a small farming area in northeastern Washington state - even they have had (non-Comcast) cable internet available for 15-20 years.

I'm sure there are places where Starlink was the first non-dialup internet available, but I suspect the list is smaller than you believe it is.

If that's what they're trying to do, they're doing a piss-poor job of it!

I get measured speeds of 2.4G down, 300M up from Comcast for $80 a month. I have to say that works fine for me, even on my remote work days.

No $40 monthly deals have shown up here...

When I last looked at Starlink, they were charging more than Comcast.