Comment Re:I can see the pattern now (Score 1) 416
Whatever the drug companies think is bad for their business, must be good for the consumers.
Yes, and there is far more profit in anticancer drugs than pain pills. Which is why they hate vaping even more than medical marijuana and use bigger lies and the junker 'junk studies' to back the lies. Follow the money to find the lies. Fortunately for medical marijuana proponents big pharma has fewer allies as most politicians think that marijuana will increase tax revenue but they know that people switching from smoking tobacco to vaping will decrease it.
Comment CrossOver has done similar for many years (Score 1) 195
Comment Re:Sounds like anti-vaxxers (Score 1) 470
Pro-vaccine but anti-GMO here, don't lump people into one group. Some of us are concerned about ecological implications of GMO as well as predatory and questionable business practices of companies like Monsanto. GMO isn't JUST about the food, there's a bigger picture to take into account.
Um, you might want to research what they used to replace the mercury with when they went from 8 shots in the 80s to 49 today. I want to return vaccines to what I had in the 60s. Seemed to be quite adequate for millions of us. Nice comprise between none and way the heck too many in my book.
Comment Re:No problem (Score 1) 361
Also unknown if the cap was child proof to begin with. Many E-liquids have used these for years even though they will not be required by law until next month when the FDA deeming regulations start taking effect.
Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 361
Submission + - Why Don't Scientists Kill the 'Demon in the Freezer'? 2
Some scientists say that these residual stocks of smallpox should not be destroyed because some ruthless super-criminal or rogue government might be working on a new smallpox, even more virulent than existing strains of the virus. We may need existing stocks to produce new vaccines to counteract the new viruses. Meanwhile, opponents of retention argue that there’s neither need nor practical reason for keeping the virus around. In a letter to Science magazine published in 1994, the Nobel laureate David Baltimore wrote, “I doubt that we so desperately need to study smallpox that it would be worth the risk inherent in the experimentation.” It all comes down to the question of how best to protect ourselves against ourselves. Is the greater threat to humanity our propensity for error and stupidity, or for dastardly ingenuity?
Comment Re:Simple question (Score 1) 342
Comment Re:um duh (Score 1) 190
Comment Re:um duh (Score 1) 190
You know, that whole "moderation" thing...
Remember, moderation in all things, except, perhaps, dietary diversity!
--James A. Duke
Though I do agree with gosand's other views.
Comment Re:Reach of misinformation (Score 1) 54
A particular information is that the "correction" often fails to travel as far as the original misinformation.
Almost always fails to travel as far. And a more recent and still ongoing example than Columbine are the junk studies bashing electronic cigarettes. Every one has been countered or exposed as the junk it is yet they keep coming and have for over five years.