This guy gets it.

We're old here. The kids that used snap ten years ago are adults still using snap.

Yes, wierprints. We here at slashdot have the pulse on fashion in a way that most ordinary citizens do not. Your commentary is quite obvious to us, the arbiters of high fashion.

This is why Gay men will never break into High fashion, they simply do not understand fashion the same way that hetro men do.

Cursor has a model? Oh yeah, I totally forgot they had one. Literally. Not a joke.

Cursor has already peaked.

This is very important. There's a light-year of difference among a typical scholarly article, a physics paper, a math paper, or some kind of incomprehensible humanities bafflegab that no sane person could comprehend. The former, if it's not too technical, should be readable to the average undergrad. The second and third might not be because there are so many specialized concepts and so much specialized language. The latter (and I'm not indicting everything coming out of the humanities, but a lot of it) is incomprehensible because it literally doesn't make sense.

Maybe its just the lazy slashdot blurb choosing per usual, but just recounting a single teachers antidotes? Such bullshit. Don't post that crap. Come back when you show a statistical meaningful test decline in both reading and math.

So, ai agent places "prediction" that public figure A is dead, orders product from grocery store with hidden ingredient they are known to be allergic to and delivers to their house. This isn't Asimov, we built the bots without the three rules.

Are you sure? I'm pretty sure Facebook offers that same level of quality content, and advertisers seem fine with it.

Did they take into account that most countries drive on the right? If you're walking the perimeter of a room counterclockwise, it might be because you are staying on the right.

By your powers combined, I am... the British Colonies!

Yeah, sanctions are from other countries that we aren't actively supporting in a current war.

I would argue that it can not be good, without facebook somehow knowing how you felt about what you were looking at on line. When you read an article discussing AI, are you doing that because you love AI, you're invested in AI stocks, you hate AI, you use AI in your job, AI took your job, the image with the headline was interesting, or maybe just random click. Thats hard for it to figure out, so it might just send you all the AI things in your feed to see how you respond.

Yes, I was assuming they've been doing this since day 1 of selling advertisement. I'm assuming this is targeted towards advertisers, trying to make them think the ads are better targeted now, thus justifying a price increase.