Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:My personal boycott of Amazon (Score 5, Interesting) 45

People who think like you are the reason that not just "mean," but truly harmful and unethical companies prosper. You have agency. You can make decisions for yourself. You can, and should, make the best decisions, even if they make you less convenient, comfortable, or trendy.

My family stopped shopping Amazon altogether several years back, along with Walmart. We do shop at farmer's markets, but we also go to neighborhood markets and co-ops. We buy secondhand clothes (so could you, despite your attempt at a false choice between Amazon and having to make your own clothes, which is just silly). We buy used cars so that local dealers profit, without directly supporting manufacturers whose choices we dislike. And so on.

It isn't convenient or trendy. We don't care. We save a ton of money this way. And we find that we generally don't support people and practices we find objectionable. We're probably indirectly supporting some amount of evil, but we're affirmatively doing all we can to minimize our participation in it.

You could too, if you wanted to. Or, you can keep pretending you're powerless to be an agent for change, and you'll find that your prophecy comes true. But I dare you to do better.

Comment Re: Master of evading detection! (Score 1) 17

And yeah, vendors really get aggressive, especially if you're a well known company.

They throw all sorts of B.S. sales tactics at you even if you're not. I work for a small consulting & software development house in St. Louis, and when I actually look at my spam folder I see everything from the passive-aggressive ("Hey, is there someone else I should be talking to at your company? Clearly you're not responding to my pitch so now I expect you to do my research for me.") to the faux-pitiful ("I've tried so hard, Mr. Fisher, this is my seventeenth email this week (crying emoji) and I guess now I'm just going to give up on you and not make my sales goals, it's so sad, please just give me five minutes to sell you this overpriced list of leads we scraped from LinkedIn?"

I can't even say I admire the hustle, since it's all automated nowadays.

Comment Completely avoidable (Score 3, Insightful) 15

There's no excuse for an organization that serves young people to not have more stringent protocols in place to avoid these issues.

As to the "classist and ableist" discussion points, I'm not saying that the "get woke, go broke" mantra applies here ... I'll just mention that the last NaNoWriMo event I bothered going to (near Dallas, TX in 2018) featured a spirited discussion/group therapy session about the pain of being misgendered, which ground the actual writing discussion to a halt. That is when I realized that this organization was no longer for me. The more any organization moves away from the center toward the extremes of ideas and discourse, the less people are going to want to donate to keep it afloat.

Submission + - Email shows that Musk ally is moving to close office behind free tax filing prog (theguardian.com)

Alain Williams writes: An Elon Musk ally installed in the US government said in a late night email going into Saturday that the office behind a popular free online tax filing option would be shuttered – and its employees would be let go.

The 18F office within the General Services Administration (GSA) created the IRS Direct File program that allows for free online tax filings. It has been a frequent target of Musk, and one of the billionaire businessman’s close associates who holds a key position in the GSA informed staffers that the agency would close 18F in an email to staffers that arrived around 1am on Saturday morning.

Comment Awfully odd way to "preserve its legacy" (Score 1) 93

[...] while preserving the ship's legacy as a symbol of American innovation and engineering

What a wonderful new P.R. spin tactic. We're not destroying a historic icon that could be repurposed as a museum ship - we're preserving its legacy.

Translation: We know we're doing something wasteful, but we can't possibly admit that, so we're gonna pretend really hard it's a good thing!

Submission + - AskSlashdot: What would it require for you to trust an AI? (win.tue.nl) 2

shanen writes: Do you trust AI in general? What about DeepSeek in particular? Can anyone even explain what "trust" means these days? For example, I bet most of you trust Amazon and Amazon's secret AIs more than you should...

Recently I've been dabblling with a number of the GAI websites. Of course if I was a serious scientist then I'd have my own hardware and be running local tests. Or at least I'd be rooting around arXiv to see what the serious scientists are saying... All I have (as usual) are too many questions and too few jokes. Especially funny jokes. I wouldn't recognize a funny AI joke until after the AI had pwned me to pieces...

Actually the funniest joke I can think of on this topic involves DeepSeek. One of my experimental conversations on that website involved the topic of trust. DeepSeek turned out to be extremely good at explaining why I should not trust it. Every computer security problem I ever thought of or heard about and some more besides. "So what's that got to do with the price of tea in China?"

It's like the accountant who gets asked what 2 plus 2 is. After locking the doors and shading all the windows, the accountant whispers in your ear: "What do you want it to be?" And the price of tea in China is whatever Xi wants it to be! I bet you assumed the accountant was male, right? So the next questions are whether DeepSeek can do accounting or windows?

So let me start with some questions about DeepSeek in particular:

Have you run it locally and compared the responses with the website's responses? My hypothesis is that your mileage should differ...

It's well established that DeepSeek doesn't want to talk about many "political" topics. Is that based on a distorted model of the world? Or is the censorship implemented in the query interface after the model was trained? My hypothesis is that it must have been trained with lots of data because the cost of removing all of the bad stuff would have been prohibitive. Defining "bad" doesn't matter because I bet everyone agrees the Internet is chock full of bad data these years. Unless perhaps another AI filtered the data first?

What does trust mean? What sort of responses am I hoping to see? How many people still using today's Slashdot have even heard of "Reflections on Trusting Trust"? How many of the identities on today's Slashdot are just (AI-driven?) sock puppets? (Speculations on a mutual timeline building tool to verify childhood friendships?)

In closing, if you asked an AI to analyze all of the conversations on Slashdot, what sort of changes would it show over the years? My hypothesis on this question is that the interactions based on books will trend down. Maybe that's my selective memory, but I think a "sound" analysis would should a monotonic decrease. Largely based on The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt I think the downward gradient might peak after smartphones became widely adopted circa 2010...

Submission + - Titan Sub Implosion Audio Released For the First Time (jalopnik.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Experimental submarine the Titan sank in June 2023 while exploring the wreck of the Titanic. The controversial craft imploded while deep beneath the surface of the ocean killing five people onboard, and now a recording of the Titan’s final moments has been shared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [...] In the clip, which is available to hear below, the static sound of the ocean is shattered by a great rumble, which sounds almost like a wave crashing against the beach.

It’s this noise that is thought to be the total failure of the Titan, as LBC adds: "It is believed that the noise is the ‘acoustic signature’ of the sub imploding on 18th June 2023. It was recorded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration device about 900 miles from where the sub was last seen on radar, south of Newfoundland, Canada, US Coast Guard officials announced. The five crew members who died onboard the sub were British explorer sub were Hamish Harding, 58, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, 48, and his son Suleman, 19, French deep-sea explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet (known as 'Mr Titanic'), 77, and and co-founder of the submarines owner’s company OceanGate, Stockton Rushton, 61."

Slashdot Top Deals

Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images. -- Jean Cocteau

Working...