Comment Re:Never really dug GTA 3 and newer. (Score 1) 43
Glad you enjoyed FarCry, I worked as a prog on a bunch of them
Glad you enjoyed FarCry, I worked as a prog on a bunch of them
If society is so fucked, you fantasise about dropping out and breaking it
uh, it's a fucking videogame bro. it's fun to play because it's fun to do things you generally are not allowed or able to experience in real life - even if it's a very distance simulation of it - be it steal sports cars and drive them off the top of an office building, or jump down a warp pipe and stomp on some squids' heads
it's one of the same principal reasons people watch movies or tv - it's different than your normal routine and produces emotional responses, which is a thing humans seek out
They are if you never do anything outside of the click click drool UX.
They used to be pretty simple even then, but now they have all the complexity of any other system.
This is the console release, but even the last GTA game required connecting to the internet occasionally for a blessing, though it did/does run on Linux including the online component. However, the game is also absolutely full of cheaters, so I won't be surprised if the new version requires kernel DRM.
If society is so fucked, you fantasise about dropping out and breaking it, here's an idea, spend that time trying to change yourself and society, the real world is so much more fun, you can live and feel it.
That's what the rich folks do.
Rich folks like Elon, who broke USAID, killing tens of thousands so far and projected to add up to millions?
Sure there is: it gives you several days to download it on a shitty internet link so that on the day of release you're able to play it. Some people are stuck at 50Mbit or less internet speeds, particularly in rural or financially depressed urban areas. You're going to have people tethering their phone to download it.
I'm going to bet we'll have an AI port and unlock of the game by the end of the month.
Why tear down a bunch of fossil fuel power plants still in their prime just to replace them with a technology that's still rapidly getting better?
Certainly don't tear anything down. Mothball those plants in case they are needed in wartime, during unprecedented weather activity that disrupts solar production for long periods, etc. Maintain a reserve of fuel for them in the bargain. Coal is great for this because it's great at lying around. You certainly don't want to use it if you don't have to, but it would be foolish to dismantle it. It's worth paying to store it.
reducing effectively the fossil fuel consumption
No, this isn't a thing. It's either being increased or reduced. The USA is doing worse by increasing, but we also need to be actually decreasing the use of fossils.
Apple told MacRumors that it decided to sunset the forum after a careful evaluation of strategy and customer needs.
What customers need is information, so Apple has decided to bury some, because customer needs run contrary to Apple greed.
I had a B&W G3 with the Rev.1 logic board defect which caused data corruption on UDMA transfers. Apple elected not to include their page on remedies when they brought the old TechInfo Library into their new Knowledge Base, because instead of replacing the defective hardware, they told you to buy an expansion card and use up one of your four slots for it, at a time when literally the same card was $20 for PC or $100 for Macintosh.
Hiding information is what Apple does. That's how people can think their hardware is high quality.
I put WiFi 7 in my PC for twenty bucks, counting the antenna. They've got WiFi 6 that can only reach 24'? What year is it?
Increasing the energy demand is their problem, though. We can and should build societies in ways which use less power, like designing them to not need commutes. China wants to call itself Communist, let's see some Communism! Let's see them Commune! But the best they've managed so far is to do some minor riffs on the western strategy like building their big square skyscrapers with bamboo. (Yeah they have some amazing buildings, so does everyone else, let's not get into a dick measuring contest because that would be too ironic.)
As you say, the west is totally repugnant in this regard. The USA exemplifies this. But it makes me sad to see others repeat our mistakes.
There's no fair measure, there's only equivalent ones.
Measuring per-capita is only fair if the capita is making the decisions.
Yes, we all need to change, but China accounted for 31.84% of global CO2 emissions in 2025.
That's not a "but", if anything, it's an "and".
Learn to read. Five months of deflection is not due to a single employee. It's due to a single employer.
Measure twice, cut once.