Comment Meh? (Score 0) 42
The information ABOUT the version is much more valuable than the source code.
You don't put the source in a history book and that's the only place unix v4 is valuable.
The information ABOUT the version is much more valuable than the source code.
You don't put the source in a history book and that's the only place unix v4 is valuable.
Hahaha, what?
You say the pilot in control should have intentionally sheered off the wings (FULL OF JET FUEL) off during a dual-engine failure? You obviously have no idea about planes.
There is nothing that could have been done. They were past V1. There was no arrester pit at the end of the runway (which wouldn't have done much). We're talking about a vehicle loaded with 10,000s of lbs of fuel. Sheering the wings off would have spread chaos and destruction.
There is nothing that could have been done.
after the demo where they massively overpay for clean hydrogen they start burning the stuff you get from natural gas.
Hydrogen is BS in all practical applications.
Dear AMD,
There wasn't any confusion. We heard what you said.
Now you're backtracking - so it seems like the only confusion was with amd.
Ok, except: that doesn't address vulnerabilities in C/C++ apps which are stopped in Rust. This also ignores the fact that there already exist functional tests of these core utilities.
If I can swap a 2mm hex nut from company A for a 2mm hex nut from company B -- and the nuts pass acceptance tests -- that's what you want. It's *ELIMINATING* sources of error within the existing framework of tests.
Sounds like a huge waste of resources. P = MV. Any form of air-balloon is
Also, do you not understand what ADSB is? I think you mean TCAS.
This does not have free will. It reflects the biases of information. That it displays oppositional defiance disorder means the creators of the model failed to curate the input data correctly. Garbage in, garbage out.
Does NO ONE understand how LLMs are implemented? It's only a statistical model! Learn statistical experiment design and analysis. Always have HITL safety rails. Always have cross-check software safety rails. These concepts are new to people who don't study information science. These concepts are decades old to people who study information science.
The term you're looking for is "human in the loop" aka HITL.
Don't you just go into linux and kill some processes or turn off the computer?
How does the AI have any influence over whether it's running or not?
Oh, so a tiny invertebrate insect (not a mammal) surviving that far north, is a simple by-product of tourism?
Dude, I have some magic beans and a bridge in Brooklyn. Buy them from me. This offer is exclusively for you. Make me an offer.
For anyone not suffering from brain trauma similar to what Phineas Gage had, the reasons are clear. Climate change.
I'd much rather have anything else that's not an optical drive in that volume. Mostly battery but even just some usb ports would be better.
Optical drives being gone is a feature not a problem.
Sorry, I didn't know the school bus had it's lights on because I didn't bother to look very hard
"ticket dismissed" -- my ass
if the manufacturer had a backdoor
I really don't like the current setup
How many hardware guys does it take to change a light bulb? "Well the diagnostics say it's fine buddy, so it's a software problem."