Obviously. But the always offended cretins are not interested in facts or reality.

Clearly, the difference is that one group has an contractual relationship with Red Hat and paid for that, while the other does not. But you seem to be an idiot, so the difference in liability levels is probably lost on you.

I see you have no reading ability. I was referring to "new computer", not the one form the story, very obviously.

I guess the rest of your "analysis" is on "utter crap" level as well. And no, the war in Ukraine is not destroying our economy either. For that you have to get a moron in power that imposes massive tariffs and makes everybody wanting to stop to trade with you at all and removes all stability from trade. Oh, and starts a disastrous war with Iran to misdirect away from him having raped underage girls.

I do not understand what exactly happened here. Who messed up by getting attacked? Who messed up by trusting these people and downloading their packages without further review? Who is "@redhat-cloud-services"? Was this RHEL paid for subscribers that got hit or regular FOSS users?

In your case it might simply be that there was not enough of this kind of tasks in the training data.

Not exactly. Personal originally meant "not shared with another person". Originally, it meant a computer only you have access to, only you install and run software, and only you store and retrieve data.

The user interface is equivalent functionally (in the strong, formal sense) to a part of the code, because it is right in there. And no, the UI will NOT give you that information either.

Seriously, are you stupid or what?

Indeed. Just like the Russians to not understand what surveillance tech can do.

Indeed. But seeing how my comment got moderated down, I guess a lot of people are deep in AI psychosis now and cannot tolerate any criticism of this new golden calf.

Hmm. Good point. People would be stupid enough to buy this, but they probably cannot afford to. Incidentally, I just got one, but I am in Europe and our economy is not systematically being destroyed.

Indeed. And especially not one signed by MicroSlop.

The core reason why I have only bought AMD graphics cards for a long time now.

Well, first you have to be stupid. That covers about 80% of the human race in some form. Second, you must be technologically incompetent. And then, you must be in awe of Microsofts dominance, while having no understanding of the abysmal (and getting worse) product quality they deliver. I would say that for the time being, this may be a product they can actually sell.

Not only that, Clippy will now be adjusted with Artificial Insistence to maximize annoyment! So much winning! So much respect for the customer!

I agree in general, but not with this strong phrasing. I've let AI build a good amount of non-trivial code. But my consistent experience is that it works best when guided by an experienced coder who can correct it, and when implementing well-known algorithms rather than coming up with novel solutions.

Example: I let it write up a quadtree implementation in a language for which there was no ready solution online. It took 2-3 correcting prompts to get a good result. I could've done it myself but it would've likely taken a few hours to get it all right instead of the half or so hour it took with AI. The important part for me was that there's nothing unknown in how to implement a quadtree. All the AI needs to do is take the 100s of existing implementations and translate them into a different language.