it is LGPL2 or later. So LGPL3 applies. So the anti tivoization clause applies.
That's the opposite of how that works. It's LGPL 2 or later. That means you can follow the terms of redistribution from either license. Either. Or.
Sure. But it won't be your usual Linux distro.
It will do the same jobs. Most of the software on which we depend predates the GPL3 and/or uses an even more permissive license without an anti-tivoization clause.
The most fortunate part of Bell Labs' situation, however, was that in being attached to a monopoly it could partake in long-term thinking... Without competition nipping at its heels, Bell Labs engineers had the luxury of working out difficult ideas over decades.
Was it the monopoly that made the difference? Or was it simply management smart enough to not only not kill the goose, but also to feed it? They had wins, they got more funding, they had more wins, repeat until they no longer got more funding and stopped getting wins. What's probably more important than why they succeeded is what happened at the end.
Installer level disabling of the installation of systemd, please.
If you're a Debian derivative user, it's called Devuan.
* Note: Removing systemd from a systemd-based system is madness. There's a reason Devuan exists, and it is that simply changing the init system on Debian results in a lot of breakage, which best illustrates the biggest problem with systemd.
systemd is an integral part of many Linux systems. Adding the birth-date to it is the issue here. It's not the right place.
Yes, that is literally the entire ethos behind systemd.
It's crazy to expect a distro maintainer in a sane country to need to yank it out of there manually
Yes, that is literally the entire situation with systemd.
This change literally could not be more on brand for systemd.
What were you thinking making changes like that without firstly checking with the entire community?
That's systemd in a nutshell. Only people like that would willingly work on a project like that.
A Linux distro (even preinstalled) cannot be closed source and/or unmodifiable by the end user, the GPL3 made sure of that.
The Linux kernel is GPL2 and glibc is LGPL, and you can construct a complete userland without any GPL3 components. Also, you seem to be under some weird misapprehension that the federal government will follow the law, which it has never done across the board.
Slavery and many other such things were once legal.
Amendment XIII
Section 1: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction".
Section 2: "Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation".
Emphasis mine.
The hate really should be directed at the politicians who pushed for these age gate laws
Collaborators can get it.
For the true paranoid, if you need to sandbox, you're doing it wrong.
Everyone is doing it wrong, that's why we need to sandbox.
Even if you were perfect, you wouldn't have time to do everything yourself, so you would still want sandboxing to protect you from the efforts of others.
Even if there is no alternative, and internet for some reason is an absolute must, I'm not above cutting a ribbon cable with an exacto knife. Dead screen on fridge is better than ads on fridge.
YES! I replaced my GE fridge because it broke with a new Samsung and I was amazed that the fridge was perfectly happy to work without a filter. The GE one had a goddamn RFID sticker on it, which made replacements $80-100 as opposed to the previous RFID-less ones (which were internally the same damn thing) which cost about $20. If you wanted to put in one of the $20 filters, you had to watch a YouTube explainer video of how to carefully remove the RFID from a "donor" filter, carefully install it on the new filter, and ignore the fridge warnings about how it needs to be replaced constantly.
With Samsung? Remove the filter, done. It has a built in bypass when no filter is present. We don't bother with filters, our water tastes fine from the tap and aside from ice, we use water from the kitchen tap 90% of the time anyway.
There's a cell IOT signal designed for single kb/s that is so cheap it's basically free. I know because my former company did some testing on these for IOT devices like temp sensors, water sensors, etc. Those devices were usually less than $20, and included a battery that lasted months.
Something like that can't serve visual ads, but it can send fingerprints of your activities so they can be served to other devices with higher speed connectivity.
I love our samsung fridge and microwave. They "just work", have no screens, and the features they had were perfect for us. We replaced old GE devices, that were about 5-6 years old and broke. Not saying you should change your opinion, just that individuals can have different experiences.
"Apple has never offered a product that justified a large chassis. It used to be lots of slots, hard drives and other storage that justified it. Macs have never been about that"
I see you don't remember the 68k Macs OR the PPC Macs. Apple offered machines with lots of slots ever since the Macintosh II line. HTH.
Too much latency for RAM.
I don't do it for the money. -- Donald Trump, Art of the Deal
