Comment Re:So what? (Score 1) 48
Sorry, but just because A is guilty of something doesn't mean that B can't have done it to A.
OTOH, it's been ruled that the output of AIs isn't copyrightable, so...
Sorry, but just because A is guilty of something doesn't mean that B can't have done it to A.
OTOH, it's been ruled that the output of AIs isn't copyrightable, so...
Yeah, they'll be able to get fall-guys. They won't be able to get the decision makers.
Well, the CEO won't be in Australia, so they're going to have to operate through extradition proceedings. Good Luck.
Fun fact, Ackman is a hardline Trump supporter who helped get him elected.
" suffering a brain hemorrhage that would render her unable to move, speak or see,"
And they went with sight in the headline? Being unable to move is waaaaay worse.
Anyway, I feel bad for her and him (though he's a right-wing nutjob who has used his wealth to help drag down American society).
This is an experimental treatment that you wouldn't want. It's probably not going to work. This is not the sort of thing that organizations would invest money in. But it *MIGHT* work. And that's what he's hoping for.
A better choice is one of the GLP-1 drugs. Those have a much better chance of success, and MAY retard aging. We're doing a mass experiment at the population level to find out whether long-term use has any bad effects...but it *is* an experiment. There *may* be very bad long term effects. (There have been a few, inconclusive, signs.)
If you want a treatment you can trust, look for one with a long track record. It may not appear as good as the latest offering, but you'll have a better idea of it's benefits and defects (and there *will* be defects).
The difference is that he can try to do something about it that may help others in a similar circumstance.
I don't even understand cheering for his suffering, but why can't you cheer for his support of medical treatments? Yeah, he may be a lousy person, but that feels, to me, irrelevant.
I think you are giving China praise it doesn't deserve. But it does seem to favor a different set of people than does the US.
It's not unreasonable, but it does sound like a gamble. Since Mt. Sinai is involved, I'd be rather sure it's not just a scam. (Which doesn't mean it may not be based on some fraudulent papers. Just that I doubt the folks at Mt. Sinai are involved in the fraud.)
OTOH, I really doubt that this is a reasonable approach to longevity. But that doesn't mean it's not a reasonable treatment for some particular problem.
Considering all the fertilizers, insecticides, etc. they use on golf coursed it's not that they don't need to clean up the water they release, it's just that they don't.
If you do it with one prompt, then the skill is in the AI.
With the right treatment, even a moderately lousy idea can turn into a good, or at least decent, movie. The less control you give to the AI, the more the quality depends on the guy that controls it.
Also, please not that quality isn't that easy. Even some famous works of art were panned by both audiences and critics when they first came out. Basically, the didn't meet the expectations, because they were trying something new. (Of course, most things that were panned by both audiences and critics, really were judged to be terrible over the decades.)
It hasn't been long enough for that to be "obviously wrong". OTOH, and speaking as definitely NOT an expert in the field, their financing looks...suspicious.
I think your projection of future AI is based too strongly on current capabilities. But it WILL aim for the lowest common denominator.
OTOH, I find most movies to be unwatchable, so my judgement is biased. My tastes are definitely those of a minority. E.g., I hated what the movie did to "The Wizard of Oz", and especially the way it corrupted the ending.
I think some folks are posting from things that have "smart quotes" turned on, and either don't want to, or don't know how to turn it off. Or they just don't care.
If you mean "It's not an important reason", well, that's right. But it's a bit more convenient, just like teaspoons and tablespoons are better fit to most recipes than are ccs, but either can be made to work.
P.S.: Celsius is just as unreasonable as Fahrenheit. If you want a reasonable temperature, use Kelvin...but it's not as convenient.
"Right now I feel that I've got my feet on the ground as far as my head is concerned." -- Baseball pitcher Bo Belinsky