Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: So? (Score 1) 148

I have been trying to make him understand that he is a complete moron for a very long time now, but he cannot be reasoned out of that which he has not reasoned into. He is only capable of building strawmen and attacking them to support his obvious rationalizations. Trust me, you are wasting your time trying to have an intelligent conversation with him.

Comment Re: Haven't read the book, but... (Score 1) 134

Western civilization didn't end slavery, they just converted it from race based to class based. The rich continue to make sure they benefit while others spend their days working for the benefit of food, shelter, and minimal survival. They have just managed to get the slaves to have no idea that they are slaves and in fact take pride in their slave status. I'm the case where some extra cash is left over they have programmed the slaves to hand that over to the rich in exchange for useless trinkets and tickets to various events designed to keep them complacent and avoid actual thought that might make them realize what is actually happening.

Comment Re:Fake Issue (Score 1) 362

No, the one that answered:

"You know what he means, ahole. If this were truly a problem the jet fuel would be rationed and private aircraft would be at the bottom of the priority list"

The entire point of rationing would be to REMOVE the pure market forces that would deal out the limited commodity to those with the largest wallets and replace it with a scheme that benefits the most people, instead of the most money.

Comment Re:So ... (Score 1) 362

Palestine

You are aware of what happened Oct 7, 2023, right?

fascist

Actually, islamic fundamentalists qualify for that statement in absolutely every way. So at the absolute minimum you'll have to concede that there are two fascist sides.

Comment Re: "Have you said thank you once?" (Score 1) 362

There was a treaty in place that was working

For sufficiently gracious definitions of "working". Iran was quite busy building up conventional weapons including delivery systems that could be re-purposed for nukes as well as moving towards nuclear weapons. There is no civilian use for 60% enriched uranium. Moreover, the number "60%" is misleading. The work to enrich isn't linear. When you have 60%, you're not 60% of the way from raw to weapons-grade, you're 95% of the way.

To put into context just how insane any claim that they had 60% for any peaceful purposes is: Most nuclear reactors use uranium enriched to 3% to 5%. 60% isn't "a bit more than usual". It's a fuckton more than any non-weapons use can reasonably explain.

And now we're in a situation where Iran has every good reason to get nukes, to defend themselves.

Iran didn't need a reason. We all know the reason they already had: Wiping out Israel.

Slashdot Top Deals

Memories of you remind me of you. -- Karl Lehenbauer

Working...