"As per the information from Air India, the suggested inspections were not carried out as the SAIB was advisory and not mandatory. The scrutiny of maintenance records revealed that the throttle control module was replaced on VT-ANB in 2019 and 2023. However, the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch. There has been no defect reported pertaining to the fuel control switch since 2023 on VT-ANB."
So the inspection recommended by the 2018 advisory you mentioned was not carried out. It is, however, not relevant in this case since the whole module (which includes the fuel control switches) was replaced for other reasons. So if the switches had been, inded, defective in 2018, that was corrected by the whole module being replaced.
I looked at the linked PDF of the legal complaint. It contains a couple of exhibits illustrating the allegedly plagiarized images. They show a man standing in front of an orange-hued urban landscape, not dissimilar from those that occur in reality during wildfire episodes
Claiming copyright infringement on generic images of orange skies would be akin to the producer of the movie "The Beach" suing anyone who prints images of a beach resort with white sands and turquoise waters.
"The new bill would require companies training new AI models to test their tools for 'unsafe' behavior."
So I guess they want to re-invent GOODY-2?
When doing do, Bard's answer to "Can 2 + 2 = 10?" is
"2+2=4 in base 10, the most common number system. However, in base 4, 2+2=10. This is because in base 4, there are only four digits: 0, 1, 2, and 3. Therefore, 10 in base 4 is equal to 4 in base 10."
And then it goes on a long explanation on how to convert between base 4 and base 10
Memory fault -- brain fried