And the thought never occurred to you the AI gives you code riddle with syntax errors somehow gives you the correct code. It must be my fault. Just like it was my fault that you assumed everything.

Regardless if I need or want help, you think I need help from you. I don't want your help. I don't need your help. You don't accept it when someone say "no" to you, do you?

I think he was talking about casting Orlando Bloom to play a younger Legolas ten years after he portrayed him. It was unnecessary as The Hobbit book did not feature Legolas. It has been a while since I read the book, but I only remember Legolas being mentioned briefly in the book.

The real question is how much studio interference will there be? A reason The Hobbit trilogy was terrible was it was a trilogy. But the trilogy was mandated by the studio. There was simply not enough material to make 3 movies only 2. Another reason was the studio interference drove away Guillermo Del Toro who was originally supposed to direct the trilogy. Peter Jackson had to step in as he was the head of the production company. Instead of years he had to plan for The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Jackson had weeks to prepare for The Hobbit.

It was not an argument from authority. I posted metrics about the movie. You have posted nothing but your personal opinion.

The Oscars are based on a voting system of peers. In this case a peers in the motion picture industry. My point is that is their opinion. How should your opinion negate theirs other than your own personal taste of the movie?

As a director, he has made the studio money. That is my point. Some directors lose money for their studios.

With that all said: Do you have any points other than your personal taste of the director's former movie that he is not credible.

His argument is his opinion of a movie projected onto another movie is equally meaningless. He thought the previous drama/comedy movie was boring. How does that make the director less credible when it comes to his new documentary movie?

Credibility is not the same as opinion. Your argument is your opinion which is based entirely on your personal taste of the movie should automatically negate everything about the director. If we look at metrics, the movie made $143M on an estimated budget of $25M at the box office. If we look accolades, it won seven Oscars. Besides your personal taste, did you have any points about the director's credibility?

Do you hear yourself? I never once specified what I promoted exactly. But it is my fault you assumed.

And that is the height of arrogance. You assumed that I needed or wanted or asked help. I neither need or want your help. End of story.

I have NEVER posted what was in my actual prompt. I posted GENERALLY what I asked. You assumed or imagined what I prompted.

So none of your criticism have any relevance if you don't know what I prompted, does it?

One of the lessons we've had as the Federal, multi-branch nature of the US governmennt has frustrated Trump is that the government may be fucking us over, but it's not doing it in *unison*. It's doing it piecemiel, on the initiative of many interests working against each other, just as the framers intended. The motto on the Great Seal notwithstanding, there are myriad roadblocks to consolidating power in the hands of a single individual. It takes time and repeated failures. This is why the second Trump Adminsitration is worse than the first; they've figured out ways around things like Congressional power of the purse, put more of their henchmen in the judiciary, and normalized Congress lying down and letting the president walk all over them. It's a serious situation, although fortunately Trump isn't long for this world.

Before anybody points this out, a gallon of bleach (the common size) is currently well over their weight limit. OTOH, that doesn't mean we shouldn't be thinking ahead to the possibility of hackers ordering risky combinations of materials that might ignite or release hazardous fumes if jostled. I don't know if Wing's drones drop cargo like other services I've seen either. The videos I've seen have drogue parachutes but things still come down a bit fast. Anyway, it's not a realistic concern *for now*, apparently; but hopefully it's being considered.

I'd like to send an order of bleach, ammonia and thumb tacks to 1000 of my closest friends, via drone.

Unfortunately this administration is unlikely to pursue the case further.

Back to the point, which AI model would help the engineers at TSMC, Samsung, and Intel solve the hard engineering problems with chip fabrication at the leading edge? If you know, you should contact them with your suggestions. If you don't know, you can't assume that AI will solve their problems. AI with the right expertise can help remove a lot of trivial work. The issue with AI right now is people who have no expertise thinks it can solve any problem in a field which they have no expertise. It is a classic example of Dunning Kruger effect.

And you know this how? Were you there to see my actual prompt? No, you were not. But you are sure that was the problem.

And with limited information, you are sure it was me.

That's a lot of insults and assumptions in one place. 1) How do you know what my mother tongue is? 2) You seem to imply my coworkers to dumb to understand more than AI? 3) You still do not know EXACTLY how I phrased my prompt.

Your MAJOR assumption is that is EXACTLY what I prompted the AI and that is not GENERALLY what I prompted. I never pasted what I prompted exactly, did I. You just assumed it and went with your assumption.

Again you don't know what I did. You are laying assumption on top of your bias.