Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Another video going around... (Score 1) 69

Combine that with video of the plane shortly after takeoff showing those wing tips HIGH in the air.

Can you quantify how that might be a problem? ie "The wing tips were 3 feet higher than normal limits." From what I know, many parts of the 787 like the wings are made of composites like carbon fiber. The wings appear to bend more than on the 787 than on the older 777 which used traditional aluminum alloys. The new 777X will have composite wings and will bend more.

Comment Re:Boeing (Score 3, Interesting) 69

While Boeing recently had issues with safety and manufacturing, this plane (registration VT-ANB) was built in 2010 and delivered to Air India in 2014. Air India has been flying this particular plane for over 10 years. The root cause might be a design defect; however, it does not appear to be a manufacturing defect at the moment.

Comment Re:Criminal levels of stupidity and ignorance (Score 1) 100

In an interview after the disaster, Cameron said he was at first intrigued by what OceanGate was doing. He was not outright opposed to the idea of using carbon fiber for the hull as he thought OceanGate might be doing some new and novel with carbon fiber like a new fabrication process or a composite. When he learned it was regular carbon fiber, he like many others were worried that people would die.

Comment Re:Feels like nothing new really? (Score 2) 100

So you knew that Rush tried to get an accountant with no submersible experience to pilot the sub? You knew the legal lengths Rush went to destroy Lochridge for raising safety concerns? You knew that scale models of the second hull failed tests but OceanGate built the hull anyways? You knew how many people were fired or quit the company over safety concerns?

Comment Re:Causes of OceanGate destruction (Score 1) 100

The submersible industry is not against using carbon fiber unlike what Rush portrayed. It is not for used pressurized applications like the hull. I think it was Cameron that said carbon fiber is used for things like covers and external support brackets for cameras and sensors.

Comment Re:Why?! (Score 2) 100

One of the things that drove Rush's arrogance was he thought he proved everyone wrong about carbon fiber. In reality, he did not understand the situation. What he heard from the community that "Carbon fiber would never work." And he made multiple dives in a carbon fiber hull. What was actually said was "Carbon fiber will not work because it would not last.

Comment Re:Why?! (Score 3, Interesting) 100

These two things alone would have increased the safety factor of this project immensely.

If you watched the documentary, those two things would not have mattered. The hull was audibly weakening with each dive. One hull already developed cracks. They just made another hull without changing any thing.

From what I have learned elsewhere, OceanGate was not the first company to make a carbon fiber hull. DeepFlight Challenger was originally made for businessman Steve Fossett. After he died in a plane crash, the project was put on hold. Virgin Oceanic later bought the submersible in 2011 for five dive project. After tests determined the hull was suitable for only one dive, Virgin Oceanic cancelled the project in 2014. This was 2 years before OceanGate started to make their carbon fiber hull.

Comment Re: Just remove the Trump name (Re:What?) (Score 1) 284

No, Trump says it is made in the USA. And Trump has never lied, right? Considering the Trump Organization is not an electronics manufacturing company, they did not manufacture this phone themselves. It had to be done by a third party. The only phones I know made in the USA are Purism. Their cheapest model is $999.

Comment Re:How is another 2D image going to help? (Score 3, Interesting) 23

Guess Apple bought all the patents for 3D camera authentication?

Yes Apple bought PrimeSense who probably had multiple patents on 3D sensing. Like many companies that are purchased for their technology and patents rather than their products, PrimeSense no longer licenses their technology to anyone anymore. If PrimeSense sounds familiar, it was the technology behind the Kinect. This was probably the main reason the 2nd generation Kinect was not that much more advanced than the first generation as it was still on older licensed PrimeSense technology. Apple took PrimeSense tech and shrunk it down to make Face ID.

Slashdot Top Deals

Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules. Corollary: Following the rules will not get the job done.

Working...