Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - JPMorgan Chase Disables Employee Comments After Return-to-Office Backlash (msn.com)

AsylumWraith writes: From the article:

"JPMorgan Chase shut down comments on an internal webpage announcing the bank’s return-to-office policy after dozens of them criticized the move and at least one suggested that affected employees should unionize, according to people familiar with the matter."

"After the bank announced the policy change, it posted it to an internal company website where it often shares news. Employees are able to post comments that include their first and last names.

Many employees shared concerns such as increased commuting costs, child-care challenges and the impact on work-life balance. One person suggested that they should consider unionizing to fight for a hybrid-work schedule, the people familiar with the matter said."

Submission + - Twitter/X and Musk's 'free speech' hypocrisy (www.cbc.ca)

Baron_Yam writes: Musk's X has suspended a Canadian account for posting an image countering the current political narrative that Canadians want their country to become an American state, on the pretext that it is hate speech.

Submission + - RISC vs. CISC Is the Wrong Lens for Comparing Modern x86, ARM CPUs (extremetech.com)

Dputiger writes: Go looking for the difference between x86 and ARM CPUs, and you'll run the idea of CISC versus RISC immediately. But 40 years after the publication of David Patterson and David Ditzel's 1981 paper, "The Case for a Reduced Instruction Set Computer," CISC and RISC are poor top-level categories for comparing these two CPU families.

ExtremeTech writes:

"The problem with using RISC versus CISC as a lens for comparing modern x86 versus ARM CPUs is that it takes three specific attributes that matter to the x86 versus ARM comparison — process node, microarchitecture, and ISA — crushes them down to one, and then declares ARM superior on the basis of ISA alone."

Comment Re:"This is a pattern of lights designed to trigge (Score 2) 171

I think "speculation" is in fact incredibly weak to describe the massive coincidence it would have to be to exactly reproduce the light patterns and colours that the device uses. I'm quite happy to stick by my guns and say that it's factual, because it feels like the chances of accidentally doing it are somewhere between getting hit by lightning and winning the lottery.

Either way, whether you think "factual" is too strong or not, it's neither "unhelpful melodrame or straight up lying", so the point stands.

Slashdot Top Deals

Even bytes get lonely for a little bit.

Working...