Comment Re:What's amazing is the current craziness (Score 1) 36
The billionaires are probably telling him but he's a dementia-ridden lunatic so it's not helping.
The billionaires are probably telling him but he's a dementia-ridden lunatic so it's not helping.
As a non-programmer and non-expert in AI, how bad is this for Anthropic? By client-side they mean this is the source code to what people download anyway? This has nothing to do with the server-side stuff accessed by the Claude chat interface?
"As for why OnlyOffice was chosen over LibreOffice, the project simply said: "We believe open source is about collaboration, and we look for opportunities to integrate and collaborate with the LibreOffice community and companies like Collabora.""
Ok, since they just refuse to answer the question, does anyone else know why OnlyOffice was chosen over LibreOffice?
Currently retirement accounts enjoy heightened protections typically -- managers are supposed to be fiduciaries, which means they need to prioritize the interests of the investor over their own interests, and are more liable if they fail to do so.
HTML/CSS/DOM sucks rotting eggs for doing real GUI's. It was stretched way beyond it's original purpose of displaying static documents, and mutated into rocket spaghetti surgery and still has common GUI idioms missing or done wrong.
I'm for an HTTPS-friendly GUI markup standard, by the way. Build it from the ground up for GUI's.
It might take one person one year to write 25k lines.
A year? I've regularly written that much in a month, and sometimes in a week. And, counter-intuitively, its during those sprints when I'm pumping out thousands of lines per day that I write the code that turns out to be the highest quality, requiring the fewest number of bugfixes later. I think it's because that very high productivity level can only happen when you're really in the zone, with the whole system held in your head. And when you have that full context, you make fewer mistakes, because mistakes mostly derive from not understanding the other pieces your code is interacting with.
Of course, that kind of focus is exhausting, and you can't do it long term.
How does a person get their head around that in 15 hours?
By focusing on the structure, not the details. The LLM and the compiler and the formatter will get the low-level details right. Your job is to make sure the structure is correct and maintainable, and that the test suites cover all the bases, and then to scan the code for anomalies that make your antennas twitch, then dig into those and start asking questions -- not of product managers and developers, usually, but of the LLM!
But, yeah, it is challenging -- and also strangely addictive. I haven't worked more than 8 hours per day for years, but I find myself working 10+ hours per day on a regular basis, and then pulling out the laptop in bed at 11 PM to check on the last thing I told the AI to do, mostly because it's exhilarating to be able to get so much done, at such high quality, so quickly.
lengthy prompts to draft
Just use AI to help generate prompts!
This is an interesting observation, but not entirely false. There are edits on Wikipedia that basically amount to "wiki link every word in the article". IMHO this could well be in violation of potential laws against algorithms. I'm not sure if Wikipedia should get a pass because it is "free" or whatever.
The trick has been around since industrial spies noticed the first liar got away with it.
I wonder if stock-holders can successfully sue for lying about the cause of a sales slump?
Make the AI bubble pop already. I'll stop wanking off for a year if you pop it, I swear on my rosie palm.
I think they're arguing that they are the third thing, a message parlor.
Unions are a real-life strategy because they work. Divide-and-conquer is also a real-life strategy, because it works too.
Thus, I think the truth of your statement all depends on whether you look at this conflict between government and the the people, from the point of view of the attacker, vs the point of view of the defender.
Children do not have the maturity that is required for unfiltered access to the adult world
But they used to. In the 1980s, nobody dared to say in public, that 17-year-old me should not be allowed to visit public (or even university) (or even medical) libraries. (Or if someone did, they were still very obscure and unpopular, little more than a glimmer in the left's eye.)
If I may, could I narrow down which of these two things you think is best? First, there's exactly what you said above..
Kids have no right to use end-to-end encryption without parental consent
Kids have a right to use end-to-end encryption unless denied by a parent
Did I make it better, or did I make it worse?
They had to say it that way, because the more accurate statement is that the dealership law unfairly advantages existing automakers.
Even the entrenched automakers don't want dealerships to exist, they would all prefer to sell directly. They have better ways to keep down competition at the federal level. Dealerships just take a cut of what they could be keeping all of if they didn't exist.
That's a valid point, though right now while they're facing competition from startups the dealerships do provide them with a moat that they want to preserve. If/when the startup threat is gone, the automakers will go back to hating the dealerships.
I think people forget how everyone laughed at Tesla because everyone knew that starting a new car company in the United States was impossible. Now we also have Lucid and Rivian. Maybe someday Aptera will manage to get off the ground. This is a novel situation for American carmakers.
UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker