Comment Re:If true.... (Score 1) 67
At least we have divorce laws now. When Bezos' wife got half his money, it was a very good thing for the world. She has done far more good with it than he ever will. Maybe Jensen's wife will too.
At least we have divorce laws now. When Bezos' wife got half his money, it was a very good thing for the world. She has done far more good with it than he ever will. Maybe Jensen's wife will too.
I tried by a moment after it opened two thirds of the screen was covered by a giant ad telling me I needed to subscribe to read it.
All the early ones seem to be kinda janky, but the idea was compelling and there wasn't really anything else like it - an open world criminal simulator.
Everyone was struggling to make the transition to 3D back then, so we shouldn't be too harsh on the first 3D GTA game. I tried V out and found it was just a bit awkward to play. Might have been my controller or something. I mostly stick to 2D and some Dreamcast era 3D stuff now.
During this time China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. Having visited, I can see that many of them enjoy a good standard of living. In fact some of the apartments and homes I was in are much, much nicer than the ones in the UK. They looked like something out of a catalogue. I could hardly believe that people were living there, with kids and pets no less.
While it's far from universal, it's still hundreds of millions of people. When it comes to quality of life, things like air pollution matter. EVs reduce that considerably. By adopting renewables we can have a better standard of living. It's not a loss, it's a huge gain.
You can slice it different ways. China is at over 4PW/year renewable generation, the US is around 1.1PW/year.
I think per capita emissions are the fairest way, but we should also look at how fast each country is installing renewables.
Remember all the whining about how we would have to go back to being an agrarian society and suffer a massive decline in living standards to get to net zero?
China is proving that isn't true. In fact, it's proving that all the fearmongering about net zero costing us too much is nonsense, and it's actually a huge economic opportunity. They can't make solar panels, wind turbines, EVs, batteries and all the other stuff fast enough to satisfy the huge demand. The energy produced is the cheapest available, which further boosts their manufacturing.
We do need to do a lot more. China needs to do a lot more. But you can't also expect people to accept poverty to get it, so the only way it will work is if we ramp up the transition to a better lifestyle and lower costs as quickly as possible.
What other fair measure is there? Unless you expect China to somehow reduce its population to US levels, per-capital is the only way to do it.
And let's not forget that a lot of those emissions are things made for American companies and sold to Americans.
Because China's population is 1.4 billion people.
What's more important is the rate of change. Every country goes along a curve where emissions increase, peak, and then drop. China was on the up slope as it industrialized, and is now starting on the down slope. The peak was far, far below where the US and Europe peaked per capita, the only reasonable measure unless you think their One Child policy was a good idea.
The rate at which China is installing renewables and storage is staggering. Just the newly installed renewable capacity from 2025 produced as much electrical energy as the whole of Germany consumed that year. Just the new stuff, and this year they are on track for it to be even more. They are adding more than a Germany sized amount of renewable generation to the grid, PER YEAR, and accelerating.
If Europe and the US were doing that too we would be in a much better position regarding climate change. It would doubtless be a huge boon for those economies as well.
* UNIX is a Trademark of Bell Laboratories.