Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment The integrated coprocessor du jour (Score 1) 46

I remember when floating point was the luxuriously optional silicon. I try to be welcoming to new things even if I don't know how/if I'll use them, because I think they don't really inflate the cost of the processors much. (Am I right? I don't actually know.)

Long-term, I think there's widespread consensus that integrated floating point was a good idea. Even less controversial, integrated MMUs are a critically necessary part of our modern world. (It's hard to imagine that separate chips like the 68851 used to exist.) The vector stuff? Some code uses it. The cryptographic instructions? Oh hell yes! Maybe I'll get reamed for this, but I think the processor industry has a pretty good track record of making silicon that we eventually truly do light up.

This time, it's a little harder. The applications for LLMs seem so niche. Part of me thinks they're doing this several years too soon. But that said:

0. Neural networks have more applications than LLMs. However worthless you think LLMs are: if your computer is good at LLMs, what else might it be good at?

1. I strongly disagree with everyone who says the hypothetical applications for this should run "in the cloud" instead of on the user's own hardware. All my experience tells me that's definitely wrong. IF this "AI" stuff really isn't a bubble (I think it probably is), then getting coprocessors widely deployed for it out there, is a very good thing. "AI" is no different from non-"AI" logic, in that whatever you're doing, from the user's point of view it should be as local as possible, and with as few external dependencies as possible. You don't need to teach me that lesson again for the 100th time, dammit. Maybe a lot of laypeople will get stuck with OpenAI's (or whoever's) services, but we will want to run it on our machines.

2. Maybe the reason there are so few existing applications that use neural nets, is that the cheap hardware to make it practical isn't out there yet! Get the silicon out there and then developers will find uses for it. Back when I was stealing my employer's electricity (and coffee) at night, I ray-traced on a network of 80386s and 80486s, and the 486's floating point performance made me a lot more excited to work on my ray-tracer. Had it ran slower, I would have moved on to the next amateur time-waster sooner.

But I can see why consumers wouldn't care a bit, right now. By the time you have real use for this hardware, I think you'll have already retired the new machine that you're buying today. But wasn't that sort of the case with vector and crypto instructions too? Different people will check it out at a different pace. It's always been like that.

Comment Re:Time for legally mandated clarity (Score 3, Interesting) 120

The government should clearly define what this is.

One of the things that makes these such Interesting Times is that while your statement would normally make perfect sense, these days the government has a financial conflict of interest in this situation, so I think they should be completely disqualified from defining anything!

Trump is doing this for the purpose of personally profiting from it, and might possibly might even be one of the bettors. He (and everyone who works for him, since they necessarily lack independence) should not have any say at all in this bet's adjudication, other than as a biased advocate for whatever position best maximizes their own interests.

If you and I have a conflict, then neither you nor I are fit to be a neutral judge in that conflict.

Comment Re:neighbor's cow (Score 2) 53

Here's the problem: if you stop relying on my cow, then the rest of my family here in my house, might start thinking they are allowed to get their milk elsewhere, too, thereby avoiding all the mind-altering drugs that I have been secretly putting in the milk to control everyone. Stop poisoning my family's minds with this subversive "use a different cow" talk!

If UK and EU citizens don't have to use our data-hungry and ad-barking servers, then US citizens might get the same idea! Surely you can see why that's totally unacceptable.

Comment Probably slightly (Score 0) 149

As an ignorant outsider shooting off his mouth on the internet, I would speculate that hybrids are likely helping the adoption of purely electric cars in a minor way, by adding scale to the production of various electric components.

A hybrid EV (at least the type popularized by Toyota) is just an EV with a local gasoline engine+alternator bolted on, right? So there are still electric motors in each. And I ass/u/me all the stuff that would be on an ICE's serpentine belt are electrically-powered on a hybrid, so the AC compressor in this hybrid could theoretically be the same exact AC compressor as in that pure-EV, etc. Thus some of the two markets' parts can scale as one, making them both slightly cheaper.

Throw in plug-in hybrids, and then we also get the fact that these plug-in hybrid drivers are creating some demand for charging networks, which of course increases the utility of pure EVs as well.

Comment We're going to lose the word "algorithm" (Score 1) 37

algorithmic feeds

We need to find, capture, try, execute, and then piss on the grave of whoever decided that the word "algorithm" was the best word for what they didn't like about Facebook. Their hasty decision, combined the word's apparent mainstream sexiness (who knew?!) is going to result in the word's loss.

Comment Re: 2nd order effects (Score 1) 111

Clarification -- by "Who would want that?", I meant "Who would want people laid off?". Not me, for sure.

If there is a hypothetical "eating in" movement, restaurants will have less custom. So serious thought must be given to livelihoods disrupted by this. Strategies are needed not just for restaurant staff, but restaurants owners as well.

When the market for tobacco declined, tobacco farmers diversified into alternative crops specific to their regional conditions -- fruits, vegetables, cotton, etc. But cigarette makers, habituated to revenues doing what they did best, diversified into "next generation products" like e-cigarettes (vapes) and heated tobacco products. They aso continued to engineer traditional cigarettes for higher addictiveness and appeal to new markets. You don't want a repeat of what happened with tobacco. The worst scenario would be surviving restaurants drifting toward food that's even more addictive and unhealthy.

Alternate business models include dark kitchens, commercial share kitchens, and local home-based chefs who sell and deliver a mix of fully-cooked food, semi-prepared food and groceries.

 

Slashdot Top Deals

"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Working...