"Contextually related" isn't a thing. Either they are are aren't violating the Constitution. They aren't any more that you cell phone carrier is for knowing your location at all times.

Security disclosures raise a legitimate question: who authorized live experimentation on public infrastructure, and who refuses to shut down these hacking attempts by turning off these "AI" scripts?

I just want one that speaks Gort.

Klaatu ... barata ... neck??? *cough*cough*cough*

If you do, millions of cats will spontaneously decrement their 9 lives counters!

Agreed. Rei has a classic misunderstanding of the data processing inequality

"All" is a broad statement my friend. The Raspberry Pi Pico RISC-V core (Hazard 3) is entirely open source under the Apache 2 license.

If by "custom chip" you mean something a chip competitive with the BCM2712, ok, but nobody would build a chip competitive with the BCM2712 from scratch just to save on ARM licensing fees; it would be an insane amount of work that would never lead to a positive return on investment.

The OP directed said Flock was violating:

Won't someone PLEASE think about the poor corporate overlords?

They're only violating the constitution so that they can hire more employees!

The story is about Flock. The OP said "corporate": Flock (not the police) is a corporation. Therefore, the "They" in "They're" refers to Flock being able to hire more employees. The story was about Flock laying off employees. There's no sensible way Flock wasn't meant as the entity allegedly doing the violating.

It was a rhetorical device to show that Flock isn't violating the Constitution.

Indeed. These are effectively just fuzzing attacks on the scale of the core Internet. What does common sense say about the likelihood that a random site's security will suffer under a fuzzed input?

The question that needs answering though is this: who at OpenAI gets fired for letting a piece of internal software directly access external websites?

I suggest someone invite Sam Altman to visit the County Sheriff's Department for an interview.

Bitcoin is also a great way for Trump to benefit.... and for Iran to do commerce outside the dollar system.

He's also not wrong about the mile high stack of shit. AI code generation often produces spaghetti code, which then requires more AI code generation to modify. But since that's also spaghetti code, it leads to a fixed point of code quality.

The models are not good at math. They use external planning tool calls and separate calculation engines that are good at math but are not AI.

It's best to think of the models as natural language user interfaces hooked up to a variety of calculators. Kind of like when a PHB is micromanaging Dilbert.

Posting a profit on AOI is very different from posting a profit on net income, otherwise known as the "bottom line," under which Anthropic remains billions of dollars in the red.

Unless you can cite the specific ruling and how it's relevant to a private company collecting data, I have no reason to believe you.

Flock collecting data is no more a violation of the Constitution than your cell phone carrier (or Google or Apple) collecting your cell phone location data.

It's not until the police search that data without a valid warrant that it becomes an issue; but there mere collection of the data by Flock violates nothing.

Cite the part of the Constitution that specifically mentions stalking.