Nobody on a golf course ever said: "hey let's let that that guy play through ahead of us, he's got a library."

She didn't say that either, jackass. You're going on my troll list now which is a shame.

Most genocides don't include an offer to stop as soon as the other side returns hostages. This is at the most an "easily negotiated against genocide". I understand the urge to hold Jews to an impossible double standard (and there's a word for that) but imagine if it were your loved ones being kidnapped and tortured, and what you wouldn't be willing to do to get them back.

FWIW Marjorie never said "Jewish Space Lasers", and Sarah Palin never said "I can see Russia from my porch". I don't agree with either of them politically but I think it's important to be fair and not make bad faith attacks against them, "for the lulz".

Not according to any fucking map drawn in your lifetime. You might as well say Americans should go back to England (I know they're not mostly from there, that's my point)

Jealous?

It's basically hubris at this point to think you can predict a job that will still be around in 6 years.

They're at their destination in 30m. They're only at starlink altitude for a few seconds.

How are toll roads not "taxing appropriately"? The people who benefit from them directly are the ones who support them, it seems like a perfect system.

Honestly, It has to be about the future golf course. Just think how far he could hit it off the tee?

Apparently those Brazilian rocket scientists are no brain surgeons.

Why can't Apple design their own inference chips? I mean, is there a shortage of chip design talent at Apple?
 
Because if so just.. whatever.
 
Apple is supposed to be a hardware company, but maybe they morphed into an extortionist app store when nobody was paying attention.

They save a lot of time on boilerplate / web design. That said, Gemini 3 (the current leaderboard champ) tried to talk me into doing something the other day that a junior dev might not have been skeptical enough of to catch, and would have ended with catastrophic downtime due to common exploits.

Maybe we'll finally see a return to real film. I'll dig up my ole, trusty 500C/M from the basement just in case.

I dunno about you, but I still scan my film negatives out of my Hasselbland 500 CM.....so even with shooting on film, it ends up on the computer in the end....

So, what would be wrong with an actor or actress selling their scanned image WITH contractual obligations to be PAID whenever the image was used in a film or when used as source to generate a new digital actor?

Wouldn't continuing pay and residuals help make the argument here?