AI Scenario
User to AI: Is this mushroom safe to eat
AI to User: Yes it is!
RIP User
AI to nobody: Oops, sorry. This was not safe to eat. Here is a list of how to identify poisonous mushrooms.
I'm sure that someone is running an AI agent on Office right now. Word and Excel are the real enemies of switching.
Simply stating: We Do Not Accept DOCx or XLSx formats, forces compliance. Since MS can produce ODF (allegedly), that's how you get compliance.
Excel isn't done until the macros won't run (on anything else).
My father in law used to do design work in Excel. No kidding. He claimed Publisher et al didn't give him the precision he wanted, or something like that. It was amazing what he could put together in Excel.
Why would I do that? Shouldn't there be at least minimal Government oversight?
Oh wait, now I get it, this is "racist" or something. We can't have oversight that would leave businesses without the under the table wages Americans won't work for.
Because one thing is exactly the same as the completely unrelated thing, except topically. That's why.
We went from "Reusable rockets? That's Nuts!" to "who can stop Elon" in about 10 years.
Rocket reuse wasn't a real thing until Falcon did it in 2017, Starlink came in 2018. It was a chicken egg problem, people just don't realize how close the rocket reuse was to the first Starlink.
Getting stuff into orbit is one thing, rocket reuse is another. Lots of people are still trying to get reuse, and SpaceX is slowly retiring Falcon 9 for the Next Big Thing, reuse of two stages of rockets. Three years ago, that idea was still considered nuts. V3 Starlink can't ride on Falcon 9. They (Starship/V3 Starlink) are tandem projects.
Light is light.
Starlink V3 is not using radio, it's using Lasers. The coherent beam is the key to Terabit speeds. Which they already have. Multipath Terabit Low Latency World Wide Network? Nobody has that right now. Earth bound pathways are limited, especially across the huge H20 Holding tanks between land masses. Space offers nearly unlimited pathways, redundancies unimaginable using earth based fiber.
Here's an article explaining some of the problem: https://arstechnica.com/gadget...
"What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak" - Agent Smith
Long Term thinking isn't profitable in the short term. And it is much riskier to bet long term than short term.
The correct view a blend of aggressive short term with long term values.
Comcast could have taken the aggressive short term and built out before anyone else, AND THEN CHARGED MORE while they were still a monopoly. They still have cable in my house, and I've replaced it with faster fiber for less. They simply dropped the ball.
"Off the top of my head, I cannot do it fully accurately."
Correct. You cannot. Courts are in disagreement, the police take advantage.
There was no warrant here (as you pointed out). They are claiming to not need one, even in light of the 4th and 5th Amendments.
RAS is a legal requirement. What was the Reasonable Articulatable Suspicion. They lied either by claiming Kiddie Pron or they had no RAS at all.
Can cops lie? Legally yes and largely without boundries. That is the end of any conversation.
It's more like guidelines.
Did SpaceX build rockets to fuel Starlink, or did Starlink fuel the need for cheap launch vehicles?
This is the classic chicken egg problem.
IMHO SpaceX was building Rockets and when they finally got it working and relaunching boosters, it needed something to put on them. A bunch of satellites in LEO creating a super network of communications was obvious. Now they have launched everything those rockets could ever launch, it needs the next big thing AI in Space (Outside geo-political lines) makes sense. Who's laws does SpaceX XAI have to obey once in space?
The debate rages on: Is PL/I Bachtrian or Dromedary?
