Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Volkswagen to cut up to 100,000 jobs globally (telegraph.co.uk)

schwit1 writes: Volkswagen (VW) plans to cut up to 100,000 jobs around the world in the next few years as part of a dramatic overhaul.

The German car giant plans to axe a sixth of its global workforce as part of a restructuring designed to save €11bn (£9.5bn) by 2030, according to local media.

Oliver Blume, the chief executive, is also considering carving up the business and spinning off the namesake VW brand under the proposals, which will lead to the closure of four plants in Germany.

It marks a dramatic escalation from the 50,000 job losses set out in a letter to shareholders by Mr Blume in March, which was itself higher than previous plans for 35,000 cuts. The company employs around 657,000 people worldwide.

The restructuring comes as VW faces intense competition from China, which has flooded the European market with cheap electric vehicles (EVs). VW sales have remained static at around nine million vehicles a year as it grapples with the competition.

Comment Re:And water (Score 1) 309

Yes, but the car has priority

Spoken like a true German. Not here it doesn't.

Obviously, the car is expected to brake ... Which is obviously law wise a little bit silly situation.

It really isn't. The person driving the piece of heavy machinery that can kill someone easily is expected to take reasonable care to ensure they don't kill someone. Yes even if the driver might be mildly inconvenienced and have to take 3 extra seconds at most to get to their Very Important destination.

Comment Re:Who's Who? (Score 1) 116

Android is weird. Don't forget that google didn't create Android: Android was first created by some company then bought by google. The Android people were pretty weird, frankly and had some odd ideas.

For one they HATED C++, in a really irrational way. I remember a forum thread when them declaring outright that certain C++ features simply COULD NOT work on Android being then disproved by another poster who showed a hand compiled gcc doing those things only to have them double down. They were incredibly insular and basically reinvented a ton of stuff pretty badly. V4L2 basically worked, and at the time they went through several camera APIs which worked worse before finally beating their own one into shape. Basically the original API was entirely designed around the idea that the only use was making a camera app (unlike V4L2 which wasn't tied to an idea of an end use), which they reluctantly discovered wasn't all anyone wanted to do. Also copy/paste. They were definitely from the "lol X si teh sux0rz" crowd. But you know what? The ICCCM from 1989 describes how to copy/paste anything in X and that still is how it works today. And it does work[*]. Android still has trouble with anything other than text in some contexts because they were insular and decided they knew best.

Then they got bought by google. The company who's motto is basically "we know we're the best why would we do it differently", so one insular, arrogant company bought another insular, arrogant company and you have Android as a result which is like Linux but cursed because the people who made it originally and maintain it now are al insular and believe they know best.

Oh and also don't forget Zawinski's CATD. Also that Sturgeon's law applies to software "engineers" as much as anything else.

Yay. Anyhoo have a nice weekend.

[*] The old "problems" with copy/paste in X were down to a number of factors. In the late 80s and early 90s, anything other than text was hard because that stuff was big compared to the size of the machines. Pus there weren't interoperable formats like HTML to exchange data. So few people implemented it, and that meant few other people did because nothing else could do it etc etc. Also a lot of people can't read and implement a straightforward spec. It ain't that hard. But basically the modern, working copy/paste is just a straightforward implementation of a spec from 1989 built on primitives from 1987. And Android fucked it up.

Comment Re:Interesting (Score 1) 96

Oh look, modded down by a clown, it must be a day that ends in y.

I know the tower near my home that I normally get signal from doesn't have a generator because it went out after the batteries ran out when we had our last quake, and Verizon promised to bring in a generator but didn't. They wouldn't need to bring one in if it were already there.

I know the tower near my work has a generator because I can see it. I could poke it with a stick through the cyclone fence.

There's a bunch of trolls on here who are mad that I know things. It's very fucking weird.

Comment Re:That's perfectly okay! (Score 1) 116

I've yet to break 1k on a computer system because it's just not that necessary.

I mean yeah as you say you're not doing anything especially intensive. I spent 2 and a half grand on my last desktop (excluding upgrades). RTX2080Ti, 64G RAM, Ryzen 9 3900X. Quite a beast in its day, though showing its age now compared to more modern machines. Mostly been used for deep learning (which is really a Linux first task) and a bit of 4k video editing and creation.

Comment Re:That's perfectly okay! (Score 1) 116

I'm an Apple fan; I'm typing this on a 2018 Mac Mini that I spent roughly $2K on -- but it's 2026 and that Mac is still running just great. That works out to an amortized cost of about 68 cents per day -- which is to say, negligible compared to my other expenses.

I'm a Linux fan, typing this on a 2010 Thinkpad W510 that I spent no idea how much on, probably 2k plus some upgrades along the way for not much. The amortized cost is very good. Definitely showing it's age, and I think the hardware will conk out or the CPU will just be too slow before it really passes out of reasonable distro support.

Even so, now it's got 32G of RAM and 1TB of flash so it's better specced in quite a few ways than many new laptops.

Slashdot Top Deals

I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated. -- Poul Anderson

Working...