Comment Re: I remember anti-drug ads in the 80's (Score 1) 13
Sure, just not many 8 year olds are customers. It's teenagers.
Sure, just not many 8 year olds are customers. It's teenagers.
It's not stupid if chaos and destruction are the goals. It's only evil.
To maggots anyone not on their party line is wrong. Too bad that party line is an unprotected signal chat.
You were mad that efforts were being made to make up for prejudicial treatment that you have benefited from and now you want to cry about it here and get other people to comisserate with you over it. You proved exactly how necessary such efforts are with your crybaby reaction.
I have at least one persistent moderation troll. The usual one mods down three in a row without concern for appearances because he knows that slashdot protects anyone who increases post count
I suspect you were just asked to be nice, and through a combination of spectrum OCD and insufficient cognitive therapy, you decided somehow you were being asked to do something wrong.
So you helped elect an ignorant sociopath. Congrats on that. Maybe you should have attended more of those cognitive therapy sessions.
Ship From Vendor - they'll give the vendor your delivery name and address, kind of necessary
Payment Processing - they'll give the payment processor your name and credit card number, again kind of necessary
Alexa and Ring Emergency Response - They'll give the police your name, address and emergency type, rather necessary as well
Etc.
They don't sell your data. Ever.
Turns out current usage != etymology (and no, a stereotypical luddite is not the same as a historical Luddite).
By all means, celebrate ignorance. I note you skipped over the #1 definition. Typical coward shit. You're afraid of knowledge.
I'd encourage Ring to find ways to close the window of access even more.
Google stores more data about users' activities than Ring could ever dream of. It's literally the basis of its primary business. Throw some more stones, though.
Your experience is literally irrelevant because it doesn't prove a negative and it doesn't speak to anyone else's experience.
Fox News is not regulated by the FCC, it's a cable channel.
Fox also broadcasts. It does matter. As you say, Fox Broadcasting! The one thing supported the other. They pretended not to operate as a network in their early years so they wouldn't be subject to requirements of networks, but they were only just under the line. I don't know where this idea that Fox is not a broadcasting network came from except possibly for that, but it absolutely is and was one and that network supported their cable network. The two are effectively one thing, that's why they called them both Fox.
Weird response. He's got it nailed. The inequity of climate change matters and the only reason Americans don't want to hear about it is that we've created both the climate change and the inequity, usually at gunpoint.
If your reasoning is the only reason, then there's 70million fucking stupid people in the USA.
You forgot to count the eligible nonvoters. They are also fucking stupid.
The sum of the Universe is zero.