I am pretty sure a simple AI check of the article would have caught this ignorant mistake.

Shame on Spaceflight Now for wasting OUR time by not doing that.

The validity of a joke, like that of an argument, is not dependent on its (sic) grammar being correct.

Are we calling it the "Edwin Powell Hubble Space Telescope" then ?

The fuck we are.

Keep your virtue-signaling woke shit out of our tech.

Wow, someone from the future. What is 2917 like?

So, our dumb phones and outdated smartphones (e.g., iPhone 6+) will be useful again? :P

It's not as if Trump's mentor Roy Cohn had anything to do with the Holywood blacklist... right? Oh... wait...

My daughter wants to be a voice actor. Guess what AI is really, really, REALLY good at?

Sorry, I took you joke seriously. Poe's Law.

Data centers are strong evidence of a death cult, but I'd avoid invoking Godwin's Law.

"Ever since the Phoenicians invented money, there has only been one answer to that question." -- Clarence Darrow

Stop right there and fuck off.

Even with good MIDI like with Roland?

Yes, makes sense.

What I mean about the floor level is that, if you look at the outside of the door on the central module, and you take that door's floor height line and follow it right the way through the craft, then when you get to the front, inside the command module, in order for the pilots to be able to see out the top window, their chairs would have to be higher not lower. I gather it's the only place where the inside doesn't match the outside.

There were the four pods, two at the front and two at the rear, above the landing struts, though. But in any case, whatever fuel source they were using must have been extremely compact. Something nuclear-based, perhaps.

I love the design. I just wish they'd worked out the floor level in the interior into the command module, because it doesn't line up.