But how does that work?
Red light is thought to activate a regeneration mechanism within the body.
It interacts with some of the compounds in mitochondria that promotes healing and cellular recovery. It also has a biphasic effect: too little does nothing, too much does nothing, but the right amount can have therapeutic value.
With Passkeys, they have access to your stuff without any oversight by courts and discovery. There are ZERO 4 and 5th Amendment rights to stuff protected by passkeys. They can compel you to unlock your phone, and put your finger on the print reader, and facial scan you
Legally it is untenable how much access they have with Passkeys.
Passcodes cannot be compelled (XKCD hammer notwithstanding). 4th and 5th Amendments apply.
If passkeys are movable, then they can be duplicated and reused by nefarious actors as easy as this seems to indicate here.
I have not, and do not, and never will trust passkeys as primary security for anything.
Passkeys can be compelled legally, with and sometimes without a warrant. Passwords cannot be compelled at all. SCOTUS has already set the rules.
Anything more to add?
Before all cameras were phones, and before all phones had beautifying AI filters, you could always refer to a believable original image... Right, I understand this adds some sort of device-linked cryptographic signature, but... this Big Feature deserves a Big Meh from me.
Details bore me. Describing a person's outfit in detail is filled with information I could not care any less about. Its not that I can't visualize, because I can and do.
I do understand why people DO like that kind of stuff, it's just not me.
Don't need a search warrant to dig though the trash can. People spew their data all over the place, and they just vacuum it all up.
I never really enjoyed reading long fiction. I read a lot, just not fiction.
I was made to read fiction in school (a long time ago), and it always bored me to read stories that had nothing I wanted. I don't find it entertaining or even relaxing.
I've read plenty of books, and in my younger years, used to read those thick IT tomes on Windows and Linux and
The lie (you've done nothing wrong) is revealed, by the factoid* that the average person commits several crimes every day, unwittingly.
*factoid: Assumed but never really provable
This is just a kindly reminder to NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE.
Ever.
"I respectfully decline to answer any questions. I invoke my 1,2,4,5 Amendment Rights. I do not consent to any searches. I refuse all roadside exams, and wish to have my lawyer present during any further interactions. BTW, here is my lawyer
* https://www.attorney-shield.co...
Then STFU.
The normal servers run a mix of RHEL and Alma Linux, Alma chosen over Rocky because of better patching record for security issues and some other things.
For the control systems that are ancient CPUs in expensive embedded boxes, Alma and Rocky have the same issue as RHEL in not having working support for older CPUs.
Google still works for this sort of thing, even if you've surrendered your common sense to the Callaway Caligula. If you don't like these examples, just search for "emoluments" or "self-dealing" , or "injunction".
https://newjerseymonitor.com/2...
And
A quick fact check:
a) Kennedy center: "Following the hearing, the Justice Department informed the judge that no physical changes or name additions will happen before October 8, 2026, leaving the issue in a temporary holding pattern while the legal battle continues."
b) Google: "As of August 2026, the administration is not currently held in active criminal or civil contempt of court in these specific cases, though it has come incredibly close."
(Of Note: The New Jersey item was a threat, not a finding of contempt.)
While google may "work" as you suggest, a random article in "The New Jersey Monitor" from half a year ago is not evidence.
There's a lot of FUD surrounding this claim, but when you drill down to facts, the US does not ignore court orders.
Post verified evidence if you disagree.
If the government is doing something illegal, they just stop.
No they don't, who's gonna stop 'em?
So your thesis is that injunctions against the government are simply ignored?
That's a strong position, I think I would have heard about it. Can you cite some examples, Mr. Anonymous Coward?
(Overturn on appeal or vacated after final decision doesn't count.)
Will the tough on crime crowd say anything about this?
Probably not.
As you may have noticed, there are 3 levels of criminal in this country.
If the government is doing something illegal, they just stop.
If a company is doing something illegal, they stop and pay a fee without admitting guilt.
If a person is doing something illegal, they go to jail.
This is the "government doing something illegal" category, which means they simply stop doing it. Justice is served, the system works, yadda yadda.
The problem is the leak is very hard to plug. Sites legitimately need to know your screen dimensions for stuff like layout.
I've often wondered if remote screening would put an end to this.
Imagine a paid service where the company serves as your window into the internet and composes your HTML and sends it to you as an image displayed by their app. You could magnify or smallify the image as needed, and the app would send mouse and keyboard events back to the company to be forwarded on your behalf.
It's not a fully formed idea, you would also need to package and send audio, deal with credit card payments, and so on, but for people with fast internet access this might be a doable solution.
(Of note: it's like a VPN, but the HTML compositing on the remote computer is an additional layer. A VPN service could randomize the output portal per session, but that's already a feature of VPNs.)
An advantage of this is that almost all the system configuration fingerprinting would be inaccessible to the wider world, if a breech happens none of your private files are available on the remote computer to be stolen, and a number of security guardrails could be implemented, such as ensuring that mouse events are short, keypress events contain only keypress information, only image information is displayed, and so on
A sophisticated client system might even incorporate multiple user identities per client user, keyed to a specific website. Your internet facing information could be different when visiting Amazon.com, as compared to WalMart.com.
VPNs aren't that expensive, and they're used by people who want the value of an extra level of security.
For most web browsing, this might be an extra level of anonymity for people who would value that extra level.
Mathemeticians stand on each other's shoulders while computer scientists stand on each other's toes. -- Richard Hamming
