Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Very strange white fibrous clots

Mirnotoriety writes: John Campbell argues that the white, fibrous structures reported by some embalmers are sufficiently unusual to warrant further scientific investigation. He suggests that their apparent persistence and fibrous composition may indicate an abnormal process involving the formation and breakdown of fibrin.

Campbell places particular emphasis on findings he interprets as evidence of disruption to the body's normal mechanism for breaking down fibrin clots (impaired fibrinolysis) and discusses low plasminogen levels as potentially relevant to this process.

His broader conclusion is that these observations should not simply be dismissed as ordinary post-mortem clots and that more systematic pathological and biochemical research is needed to determine what the structures are, why they form, and whether their occurrence has changed over time.

Campbell also raises the possibility of an association with COVID-19 vaccination. However, an association or temporal relationship would not, by itself, demonstrate that vaccination caused the structures. Establishing causation would require appropriately controlled studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations and accounting for other potential causes.

In short, Campbell's position is essentially that the phenomenon deserves investigation and may represent something more complex than routine post-mortem clotting, but the precise nature, cause, and clinical significance of the structures remain matters for scientific investigation.

ref:

Raman spectroscopic Characterization of Anomalous Intravascular Fibrous Casts: Evidence for Stage-Dependent 13-sheet Enriched Protein Maturation

Very strange white fibrous clots

Images as not allowed on Youtube

Comment Re:Canada should do something creative (Score 1) 268

Trump likes things named after him. He put his name everywhere, including the Kennedy Center.

More importantly, I cannot wait for the day where I NEVER see or hear his name again.

"E. Jean Carroll" would piss him off, be kept long after he left office, and people would always remember his crimes before they thought of him.

Comment Re:NileBlue or NileRed (Score 1) 77

You appear to have poor social skills. It's OK, so do I.

Nile's experiments have turned non-food into food, multiple times. That is what he has done and that is what they have done. That is the relations.

Yes, he is a chemist, so yes he did it with chemistry. Yes they did it with biology. Doing it with biology is less difficult and less expensive, but the method is NOT what is important.

The thing everyone cares about is taking non-food and turning it into food. That is why people click the link.

Also, nobody cares if the plastic was made from injection molding or from 3d printing. Nor does the type of plastic matter.

Comment 3 separate machines in one box, (Score 1) 36

Most modern servers have more than one core.

Not that hard to treat each core as a separate machine, all using another core as something like an internal router to access memory, graphic cards, keyboards, etc.

The hardware changes would be minimal. Basically take 4 motherboards, put it one metal box and put most of the real memory, etc. on the 'host' motherboard that allocates between the other 3.

There would be real speed penalties to doing this, but totally possible just using hardware. Duplicating it with software instead of hardware does not sound all that innovative to me.

It is more of a question do you really need to do it with software? If you want this kind of setup, do it with hardware. What advantages do you get by doing it with software - besides the real risk of someone targeting the host that determines resource allocation. I would bet actual hardware separation would be 'safer' than whatever software separation you created.

Comment Since 1700s (Score 2) 42

Our main learning style ( lecture with notes taking) education system was originally designed in Britain to ready children for factory jobs.

Alternatives concepts such as question asking (Socratic), student debate, and student presenting were considered but rejected.

They wanted:
master/servant relationship aka obedience
less creativity
larger classes

Comment Re:Original Argument Flawed (Score 1) 60

I do not use social media, unless you count Slashdot.

The Social Media companies you agree to use (with the exception of other people giving them your phone number - which should be illegal in my opinion).

There is a huge difference between a company spying on you without your permission and one you agree to let them spy on you.

Comment Bull. This is about money! (Score 1) 185

Those screens are cheaper. Once you put in a computer and a touch screen, you do not need ANY other buttons.

So they cheap out and remove as many as they can.

If you have a physical button and a week driving that car you can get to it without taking your eyes off the road.

A screen based system requires you to take your eyes off the road which makes 'multi-tasking' harder. No competent driver that has experienced a real button wants a touch screen while driving.

This is entirely about saving the cost of putting in more gauges and more buttons.

Comment Original Argument Flawed (Score 5, Interesting) 60

The original argument for these cameras was:

You are in public, it is legal for humans to physically observe you, therefore it is legal for the cops to observe you, therefore it is legal for them to use cameras to observe you.

The problem is that quantity changes things. It may be legal for a person standing in public to observe you, but for them to follow you all day is called STALKING. That is not legal.

For a cop to follow you all day, every day of your life, that is Harassament. They would need a court order to do that, or be subject to a court order preventing it.

Flock and other similar cameras do not just take pictures, they have software now to track you everywhere you go in the US (excluding Alaska) using over 120,000 cameras. They can follow you from one camera to another.

This is stalking, not merely observing.

Comment Re:Anti-capitalist shmucks (Score 1) 165

Private criticism is by definition ineffective. It is designed to inform without punish. It is in reality folding, letting Trump win.

Trump is doing a performance. He does everything as a performance without understanding the real life consequences of things.

He insults NATO publicly and wonders why they don't support his war. Why? Because he expects that only the MAGA idiots will observe the performance and is shocked that everyone else observes it and believes it.

The thing is, NATO spend decades learning that the performance IS reality. NATO saw Hitler, thought it was a performance, then paid the cost for thinking that. They saw Stalin and went on guard, finding him to be a real threat based on his words. Same with Khrushchev and Brezhnev.

Europe learned long ago NOT to trust the shmucks that claim they do not really mean their public words. Those words are believed by their own people so it does not matter if the leader was lying, the words they spoke become the truth, if they can push them hard enough.

The GOP used to not be pleased. They have driven out almost every trustworthy Republican, leaving a bunch of toadies in place. No one cares that the toadies secretly know Trump is a shmuck.

The toadies will be punished in November BECAUSE they did not fight back publicly. They could have impeached, they chose not to. Now they will be removed from office because they did not attack Trump.

Submission + - China is secretly fueling America's data center rage (axios.com)

alternative_right writes: The X Safety team probed suspected Chinese accounts involved in influence operations and identified 200,000 accounts, including 200 accounts "posting in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy," the team said in a tweet.

The posts included content on how AI strains the electricity grid and increases utility prices and "cartoons that depicted data-center operators enriching themselves at the public's expense."
It's unclear what, if any, action X will take to suspend or delete accounts from the bot farm.
X, owned by Elon Musk, whose billions rely on data centers to boost his AI enterprises, did not respond to Axios' request for comment.

Comment Anti-capitalist shmucks (Score 1) 165

The GOP seems to think that Capitalism = mean to poor people, nice to rich people. No. Capitalism = Free market = no tariffs.

Tariffs = Mercantilism.

Capitalism hates Mercantilism. Capitalism was created because Mercantilism did not work, it was created as a replacement for it.

The GOP is not and has not been capitalistic for quite some time.

Comment Not really (Score 2) 118

I disagree with the premise of this post.

1) Chatbots do NOT write well. They copy mediocre professional prose. That is not good writing.

2) For this reason, it is hard to tell them from mediocre professional prose.

3) It is very easy to tell the difference between AI and human poorly written prose. AI doesnot skip spaces by accident. It does not spell dificult words incorrectly. It's prose does not make common apostrophe errors.

4) It is also very easy to tell the difference between Twain, Shakespeare, Steinbeck, Fitzgerald, Joyce, Hemingway, etc and AIs - even if tghe AI is trained on them. AI copies style, not genius.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." -- Walt West

Working...