Comment Re:Don't forget Julius Ceasar (Score 1) 97
I remember when he was Lucius Aelius Sejanus in the BBC production of "I, Claudius".
Comment Re:Reddit ? I used to browse there (Score 1) 40
Moderators are a special kind of special.
I got banned from the entire site for "circumventing" subreddit bans, which was because some of my alts were fed subreddits by the algorithm that I was not supposed to be on.
Comment Re:What is "the internet" (Score 1) 197
Comment Hmm, your ideas are... (Score 1) 197
Comment Not the point (Score 1) 147
Comment Representative of a major AI company (Score 1) 147
how AI now does everything--you just need to buy the AI from them.
What a surprise.
Comment Re:Wrong question. (Score 3, Funny) 76
Build what, exactly??
If we build it, then it will frictionlessly tell us what to build.
Comment Re:from the files of "No Shit Sherlock" (Score 4, Informative) 61
Came to post exactly this. You gave people a metric and said that their job depended on meeting it. What did you expect?
Comment Re:Not What You Hoped For (Score 1) 65
This reminds me of a segment I saw about 15 or 20 years ago on a show called "How It's Made" that played on a channel like the Discovery Channel (before all cable became reality TV).
The segment was "How CRTs are Made". I was kind of surprised that CRTs were still being made, but I was especially surprised by the fact that they appeared to be American workers in the factory. They were doing everything pretty much by hand with no automation, and they were making some rather skinny looking CRTs. The show never elaborated on what the CRTs were for, but they sure didn't look like TVs.
I dug into it a bit after that using some clues I noticed in the show, and found out that these were cockpit displays for F15s or similar military aircraft. It's probably an item that you just don't go changing the specs on, and they understandably aren't going to farm out to TCL. I can't imagine how much each one cost, though. And I certainly wouldn't try to rack it up as a "win" for any of GWB's or Obama's trade policies.
Comment Re:Shocking (Score 0) 131
"Point us to an post about a guy given a job he is clearly unqualified"
That's literally my point -- the post isn't about the person in charge of the ministry! It's about them testing Collabora and the users just having too many issues with it. I guarantee if it was the same exact story and the minister had a male name none of you would have done this deep dive and criticism.
And why do you think she is unqualified? The Minister of Digitization doesn't need to be an expert on digitization, they need to be competent at high-level management and understanding how laws and policies work. Did she do something wrong? Would someone else have somehow convinced the 37 or however many employees who tested it not to hate it?
Comment Re:Success rate? (Score 3, Insightful) 37
The thing about ransomware is that if paying the ransom does not actually result in decrypted files no one will ever pay a ransom again.
Many of your victims won't be able to say anything even if the files aren't decrypted -- this case is a good example, since the company in question couldn't admit publicly that they were paying ransoms.
A little searching shows that scams (beyond the base "pay to decrypt") are very common. You're dealing with criminals. If you pay a ransom, they now know that you have money that you're willing to pay, and they're going to do whatever they can to get more of it.
Comment Re:Shocking (Score 2) 131
Yeah but for some reason Slashdot commenters jump to targeting people mentioned in the stories when they have a female first name.
Comment "we will get there together." (Score 1) 68
Except for, you know, the people we fired.
Comment Re:It's about time. (Score 1) 117
Yeah! Just pick out all the helium atoms, one by one, and you're done!