Oh no, you're sadly mistaken. The difference is obvious. The answer is that IDGAF. The people who need their power to be that reliable should be investing in storage, including The People investing in enough for domestic needs. But nobody should be getting their image of a furry with five boobs on their own schedule in a way that impinges on existence for the rest of us. Make hay while the sun shines.

Did you think you deserved real effort spent on conversation with you?

The phone is $200 more than their prior phone, and priced like faster phones. How was that supposed to work?

Why are real wages falling while the economy is growing?
Followup, why should workers care about GDP under these conditions?

People in some third world countries have affordable health care. The quality of life in the USA is already worse than in those.

CO2 is poisonous and directly endangers public health. Increased CO2 levels do direct harm. The levels at which they do obvious measurable harm to anyone are significantly higher than where they are in the atmosphere on average now, but levels which affect health commonly occur in poorly ventilated spaces with lots of people in them.

However, your premise also is based on a falsehood. The definition of pollution is not and never was "poisonous shit".

Because he's wrong about one thing: The Republicans will read the thread. And they say "that's woke bullshit" so they don't have to think, and then they attack so nobody else has to think either. If they can save some of their brothers in stupidity from having to think, that's a win for them.

Not compared to the guy who kicked him out of the best place in existence for asking questions, who in this mythology did the biggest multi-genocide of all time, and also sponsored some other genocides.

Costs always matter under capitalism, which dominates the planet. Unless you're advocating for public ownership of everything, they will continue to matter.

Promoting nuclear power is opposing taking the most effective steps to reduce CO2 emissions because 1) we use money to control production and therefore it matters and 2) for the same amount of money we can achieve greater CO2 reduction with wind and solar than with nuclear.

Pretending that capitalism doesn't matter is ignoring the dominant paradigm of the entire planet. Willful ignorance never improved anything.

How many people who are older than Google but like allegedly-for-kids stuff like Anime or video games are going to get told they aren't old enough to consume media with a boob or an f-bomb in it?

They always were. The Nazis were reich wing. The "witch" burners were right wing. American cuckservatives love to ban everything. That's real cancel culture. The reich loves to cry about people not buying their products or consuming their hate media as if it were equivalent to oppression.

No, it does not.

The AI doesn't know what makes secure code or not. It just makes code that looks like it's secure. Humans can do the same thing of course, but the difference is that they have a chance to know. The AI doesn't know anything at all. It only contains analyses of tokens which causes them to be stuck together in statistically familiar ways.

You could train your AI only on the best code in the world, and it would still hallucinate insecure code for you.

Many people here like to prove that they know nothing at every opportunity, so we know it to be true. This is especially true when it comes to environmental issues, so it seems apt enough here.

LLMs don't have jaws.

You're either a kid who wouldn't know, or an old fucker yourself. Which is it?

But fart-sniffing is what Slashdot is all about!