Sounds like misinformation right there, perhaps a ban is in order?

Oh wait... I wasn't advocating for bans nor pushing definitons.

Removing misinformation is not illegal either. It's common sense.

Who decides it's misinformation?

Quite a few times things which were deemed misinformation back during the COVID times turned out to be different than official sources said (at first or later).

When such heavy hands occur, especially when the government is pushing it, it makes the act seem extra suspicious, or so I've heard for the last week along cries of fascism.

Which is why I took advantage of the pandemic to GTFO of the Seattle area and are now in a much better place, the issue is always that not all companies are open to remote work, and those who are have states they can/can't hire in.

Remote work has not continued the way many had hoped. Too many companies, Microsoft included have largely decreed that if you want to keep your job, you're going to have to live/work in one of their hubs, or be very lucky. As a result, not only are many stuck there, but many medium and small companies have done the same. Yes, remote jobs exist, they are just few and far between and much harder to get than even a couple of years ago.

And fund schools enough

Enough⦠according to who?

Given weâ(TM)ve been throwing more and more money at (public) education for decades and decades and havenâ(TM)t seen the kinds of results desired or promised⦠maybe itâ(TM)s not simply a money issue?

Having people who've committed past crimes and being crime free are two different things. To answer your question; the truth is in most Asian they are openly racist and no one really bats an eye at it. Racism isn't criminal though, it's just asshole.

Why ask? To what end? They surrendered 80 years ago.

Again, a digital song is something is covered under WIPO. Journalism has special laws even if the source is copyrighted. Besides, it's China. When have they ever respected other people's copyright laws?

WIPO is just an extension of Berne and does not apply to journalism. It's for books, art, etc. Are you gonna argue a hot mic moment is a literary work? Bunch of pro censorship boot lickers.

What international law? You're just stating that as if it's true. Besides, it's journalism and in countries that recognize free speech the request would be laughed at.

No normal person, R or D, says Sandy Hook didn't happen. Do you really think it's fair to classify the most extreme in a group as a voice for the whole?

Must've been some other reason I said "In the US" then.

"Thereby solving the problem forever"

It depends on where and how big the business is. In the US, most workplace harassment laws don't apply to businesses under 15 employees.

No, they voted anti immigration and anti woke. They voted for anyone but Kamala, whose charisma rivals that of John Kerry.