Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment amazing (Score 4, Insightful) 36

It's hilarious to see a federal government sue a state for banning an insanely unregularly shitshow.

"Minnesota banning prediction markets is like trying to ban the New York Stock Exchange,"

This is your future, United States. Just the dumbest shit spoken imaginable, in the service of protecting the freedom of separating people from their money, 24/7, backed up by an administration who nakedly wants dumb people to do dumb things - oh, the ways in which such policy posture enriches them personally? Totally unrelated.

Comment Re:Only 2.5Gbps? (Score 1) 38

Clouds will depend on the frequency.

X-Ray lasers are extremely difficult but they exist. Stepping down from extremely difficult to merely difficult may have some merit.

Whether it's worth the cost will be interesting. Microsats is curious - geostationary would be an easier place to start without the steering complexity.

An interesting project for sure.

Comment Re:Will it catch the president? (Score 1) 41

Counterpoint: Is is plausible that he'd be that successful at insider trading when he has failed at every other endeavor he has turned his hand to?

Depends on your definitions, I suppose. You could argue that engaging in blatant market manipulation and insider trading from the Oval Office for 16 months and only netting $750M in profits represents a failure. Someone more competent could have made a lot more.

Comment Re: Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse. (Score 1) 98

Should it matter? The founders weren't gods, they did their best for their time. They made mistakes, and times have changed.

It really should matter. If we can just decide the text means whatever we want it to mean, what's the point in writing it down?

Amend the constitution, make it illegal.

Yes! This is the way. Unfortunately, our system is so dysfunctional we can't even pass normal laws now, much less enact and ratify constitutional amendments.

Comment Re:Waiting for the seizures and arrests to begin (Score 2) 48

In the United States, simply keeping their cars running after the manufacturer died is a fairly substantial set of crimes. Since they have admitted to conspiracy by forming an interstate group to do it, major Federal organized crime laws have been broken.

Is it? What crimes, exactly? They might be defeating some copy protection, but the entity that owned the software is defunct, so no one has standing to sue.

Comment Re:This is how revolutions start (Score 1) 146

I'm not saying this isn't a problem, but it's not really a "pitchforks and guillotines" problem, it's an Econ 101 supply and demand problem.

In this specific case, yes. But TFA describes just one instance a society-wide problem in which both politics and the economy are predicated on turning the general population into victims and servants. That can't be solved by Econ 101 platitudes.

Really? Got any examples that actually hold up to scrutiny?

Comment Re:If it's free, you are the product (Score 2) 99

I don't think Google has any intention or desire to kill F-droid

I think it's very likely to get caught in the crossfire. I don't think f-droid is big enough that anyone except engineers at google even know about its existence let alone care.

At Google, it's what the engineers care about that really matters. Google is still very much a bottom-up company. And, in any case, even if no special allowances are made for F-droid, it's very easy for F-droid to stay in operation under the proposed terms. As I said, it just means someone is going to have to pony up $25 and provide their ID. That doesn't even have to happen for each app; F-droid as an organization could become the official "developer" who signs all of the apps.

I really don't see a risk here.

Comment Re:This is how revolutions start (Score 5, Insightful) 146

This is what happens when the rights of average citizens are slowly eroded to the point where those in power lose sight of just how dangerous the disenfranchised can be. Propaganda and gaslighting only go so far. At some point the great unwashed get desperate and/or angry enough to band together and attempt to overthrow their oppressors.

Either that or, you know, Liberty Utilities (the residential power company who currently buys power from NV Energy and sells it to the homeowners) will contract with another supplier. Probably the price will be higher, which will be painful in the near term. In the longer term it will motivate regional suppliers (probably including NV Energy) to expand their production, and the higher prices will fund that expansion.

I'm not saying this isn't a problem, but it's not really a "pitchforks and guillotines" problem, it's an Econ 101 supply and demand problem.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.

Working...