Fortune 500 company - bottom half of that group is all I will say about them - laid me and some others off in a big layoff a few years ago. Yeah, they got rid of a few H1-Bs in the layoffs, but the vast overwhelming majority of layoffs were white American males over 40 years old, who just happened to be making good money. In my department, only Americans got laid off and not a single H1-B was impacted by the layoffs. I've been told that this is supposedly "illegal", but it's exactly what happened. They kept the H1-Bs because they make less money and they can't leave unless they want to return to India.
I had the exact opposite experience. The Fortune 500 company I worked at had layoffs, and shortly afterward the government started inquiring why H1-B workers weren't let go. All H1-B applications were rejected for the next 2 years and those people either found new sponsors or moved back to their country of origin.
IMHO the best way to avoid H1-B abuse is to put a floor on the salary across the board, and verify it through the IRS.
The big hyperscalers like Microsoft and Google, he said, have instituted a strategy of “offloading their capacity to other data center providers.” That’s leading businesses to use Oracle. “These are not organic customers to Oracle,” said Luria, who recommends holding the stock. “This is Microsoft, Google and Amazon’s customers that will use Oracle capacity.”
So the Big 3 cloud providers don't own their own data centers? Is the cloud some sort of infinite regress? Is it turtles all the way down?
Regulations mean nothing. Regulations are just a set of rules. The question is how meaningful the regulations are in relation to the topic under discussion, and the answer is not very. US cities, especially near industrial regions are fucking feral when it comes to particulate emissions. Just ask all the people who roll coal what rules are failing to prevent them from doing so.
It's a question of enforcement. Most large cities actually do a good job of it. I only see people "rolling coal" in rural areas with minimal law enforcement.
The Switch 2 pricing was announced well after Trump was elected, and undoubtedly included *some* additional markup for tariff increases from the get go, since he had been talking about tariffs the whole campaign, even if it has been a continual game of roulette trying to predict the *exact* tariffs. So it makes sense that the Switch 1 prices would be more sensitive to the tariffs than the Switch 2.
I *am* a good programmer, but there's a lot of boilerplate that sucks when you have to type it all out...
It is AMAZING for documentation. I've had ChatGPT create excellent documentation of my code... and then warn me about a few edge cases I forgot to handle...
You mean the JFK documents that were released containing hundreds of social security numbers of federal employees? Not exactly a glowing recommendation.
Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.