> I don't see what would be different than if he'd pasted the text into Google Docs or Word 365 to make some edits.
Government employees are prohibited from using those public cloud services for OUO as well. There are separate instances of some of these services like Office 365 which can be used for OUO, but they are kept separate for defense in depth, given these services can have bugs that allowed people to access documents they should be allowed to.

Furthermore, it is worse because the TOS for ChatGPT state that they can and will use your inputs for training, unlike Google Docs or Word 365 (at least in the past - I haven't checked recently).

He had access to AI systems that were approved for OUO, and then on top of that given special permission to use the public ChatGPT for non-sensitive documents, but chose to use public ChatGPT for OUO documents. That would be a security incident for any clearance holder, and is completely inexcusable for the head of CISA.

The most ironic part is MRP was replaced by notecards when Lean Manufacturing took over, yet ERP remains.

Exactly!

On one hand, insider trading is unfair. On the other hand, prediction markets provide societal value because of the predictions they make. They rely on participants having some sort of edge to improve the predictions.

This bet everyone is complaining about isn't just insider trading, it's also a national security leak. I think that is a larger concern.

Most hotels are independently owned. Just because it says "Marriott" on the sign does not mean the hotel is owned and operated by Marriott. If the hotel owners don't want to provide these perks, these plans mean nothing.

It's not Algebra, it's statistics.

To introduce new security vulnerabilities!

You don't want them to stagnate either. They need to innovate and sometimes innovation doesn't pan out. They can't keep making the same browser forever.

Since they didn't innovate very well you can now get products that do the exact same thing for 20% of the price.

Is this exploitable? Can you provide the algorithm with certain inputs to obtain lower prices? Let the hacking begin!

There is definitely a right size for the streaming market. IMO right now there are too many services. However, I also don't want to see any single streaming provider controlling more than 40% of the market. I don't see this merger violating that.

They are no longer required to fully fund pensions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

That's down from 15,000 posted here last week.

So, ultra-processed foods are anything not in my kitchen. I'm sorry, but that doesn't really narrow it down. We need specifics.

It seems to me the only discovery here is a new kind of statistical fallacy.