Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: sure I'll take the money, but (Score 1) 32

I'm mostly interested in Siri getting better at understanding me with semi complex queries...

Heck, I'd settle for Siri just being a better interface for the device itself.

"Siri, how long is this podcast episode?" [My hands were messy and busy - I didn't want to pull out my phone to look.] Wait, wait. "Here's what I found..." [Indicating that Siri had done a web search to try to answer this question that was entirely about an on-device feature.]

Comment Re:So, nothing really new here (Score 2) 16

This goes against my better judgement, but I have to ask .. do you think Elon is an actual Nazi? Like... he wants to exterminate Jews and other races?

Throwing the Sieg Heil around is a bit of a tell. The nastiness, antisemitism, scapegoating, and glorification of hatred that bubbles on X and Grok - guided and abetted by Elon personally - is another indication. Nazism is about a lot more than antisemitism, though - that's just a particularly violent manifestation of baser principles. Elon definitely espouses the belief that there are a certain class of folks (him being a prime example) that are superior to all others - the ones who ought to be calling the shots, and everyone else is a drag on society. Rules, democracy, pluralism, even basic kindness - these are impediments to an ubermensch such as himself.

To a certain extent, it does not matter if Elon truly believes these things or not - his actions speak volumes.

Comment Re:Go Google Employees! (Score 4, Informative) 42

It won't work: Google is a for profit company, and there are A LOT of profits to be made in the made from the military. They will stop operating in the UK before they give up that much money.

DeepMind is the core of Google's AI research, and it began as a UK company that Google purchased. It's still the case that the bulk of their core researchers are there. Ceasing operations in the UK would not only cost them a lot more than the US DoD will ever pay them, it would also cost them a lot of critical AI expertise.

Comment Re:Can't help but wonder ... (Score 1) 161

Yeah, but this isn't analogous to giving a kid one beer, it's more like getting them a fake ID so they can buy their own. One is a one-time event, the other is continual access.

To what, exactly? The answer to that question matters quite a bit.

Comment Re:Unions are for employee protections. (Score 4, Interesting) 42

Or is that no more? This sounds like unionizing to control the employer's actions or morality. I don't see how this is even a thing going anywhere.

These employees are being forced to choose between having their work product support a genocide, and being unemployed. It strikes me that they should be protected from such a choice - especially so since the company they work for once had a loudly-proclaimed motto which said "Don't be evil".

Comment Re:With what authority? (Score 1) 122

Or the administration could ask congress to pass a law to this effect. Like we used to do back during normal Republic times. Could have done that with the tariffs and then they'd have been legal.

Tariffs, deportations, attacks on drug boats, wars... almost all of the illegal shit the Trump administration has done could easily have been made legal by the GOP-controlled Congress. Early on in Trump 2.0 I wrote several letters to my very MAGA Senator, Mike Lee, begging him to sponsor and support legislation to do exactly that. Not because I thought the things Trump wanted to do were good but because I saw huge potential harm to the Republic if Congress just allowed the executive to flout the law.

Of course, Lee never responded to me. At all. And never lifted a finger to provide actual authorization for Trump's lawbreaking -- and, of course, Trump never asked the GOP Congress to do it.

The only reasonable conclusion is that Trump and the GOP (and SCOTUS) don't want the president to be constrained by law, and so Trump is deliberately doing all of this without Congressional approval in order to firmly establish the precedent that he doesn't need Congressional approval. He's doing the same thing now with the Iran war, having run out the 60-day clock but refusing even to ask Congress to authorize him to continue. GOP leadership is waffling, making up stuff (not found in the law!) about how the 60-day clock "stops" during a temporary ceasefire.

The truth is that Trump wants to be King, and the GOP wants him to be King. If Mike Johnson and John Thune wanted to, they could make Trump's actions lawful, but they want him to be able to ignore the law.

Comment Re:Can't help but wonder ... (Score 1) 161

Yes, but some things are universally inappropriate. The sexualization of minors, letting minors consume things that cause developmental problems, giving adults the opportunity to f-k them...

Sure, and for those really severe issues we draw hard lines in somewhat arbitrary places, based on broad averages. And for some of them we also don't get too aggressive about parents who transgress the rules in small ways -- for example, if you let your 15 year-old son have a beer on a fishing trip you're technically committing a crime but no one is going to prosecute you. The same is true for helping a kid to bypass age checks to access social media or whatever.

Comment Re:Can't help but wonder ... (Score 1) 161

The government could, in theory, pay child psychologists, to gather information about the child, perform interviews and analyses and produce a recommendation/strategy...

I cannot think of anything more dystopian.

You lack imagination, then. And, how would this be any different from school counselors and similar who regularly do these same sorts of things, though typically with a focus on education rather than, say, maturity for social media use?

Slashdot Top Deals

The life of a repo man is always intense.

Working...