Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment In principle, that would apply sometimes (Score 2) 350

So what I'm hearing is public execution of CEO's. Seems a bit barbaric

If the CEO effectively or directly orders an action that a reasonable person could foresee would lead to the death of their workers or members of the general public, then it most certainly could apply. In fact, a civilized society would not only punish the CEO harshly, but hold the CEO to the strongest standard under noblesse oblige which might merit not only an execution in some cases, but the state liquidating their estate and putting the assets to work for the community and victims (in particular).

Comment You're misapplying Sun Tzu (Score 3, Insightful) 350

Sun Tsu's art of war dictates that a general must publicly execute one of his men so the others fall in line.

Going after the company is not an application of that idea, an application of Roman decimation or any equivalent concept of punishing someone pour encourager les autres. You want to make sphincters pucker here? Real simple. Hold the executive(s) responsible personally. Pierce the corporate veil and go after them directly for ordering non-compliance.

Comment Re:Most people don't care this much about thinness (Score 4, Informative) 167

Do tell the location of this magical laptop where nothing is integrated and everything is replaceable/upgradeable.

Nice bait and switch there. No one said anything about it being as replaceable/upgradeable as a typical desktop PC. However, my 2008 MacBook Pro had a replaceable optical drive, hard drive, memory and battery. I bought it with 2GB of RAM and upgraded. I replaced the hard drive twice with faster models as they became available. I had replaced the battery four times.

Comment Most people don't care this much about thinness (Score 4, Interesting) 167

Apple's marketing and fanbois paint it as "would you like a brick or this elegant and smooth, ultra light beautiful product?" Phrased like that, sure who wouldn't?

Ask the same typical consumer or business buyer: "would you like a device that, in order to be insignificantly thinner, requires open heart surgery to replace the battery and if your RAM or hard drive go bad, you're SOL?"

Then suddenly, the average person says not just no, but "oh hell, no" because this isn't a $700 PC laptop, but a ~$2000 Apple laptop.

Put a designer and a MBA together and you get a team that does not understand that while the MacBook Air is perfectly acceptable as a throw away appliance, that is because it can be had for less than $1k. A normal person who spends $2500 to $3000 for a seriously performant machine in order to be the backbone of their work doesn't want an appliance. They want a machine that can be quickly and cost effectively repaired.

Comment And the best part is... (Score 1) 212

Google won't do a damn thing to flex that muscle on something as simple as forcing the carriers to not stymie any updates. I have an unlocked LG G5 and all of the carrier versions are getting updates rolled out. I contacted LG and asked the WTF is going on that my unlocked RS988 is not getting the update. Their response to when it'll be allowed? \_()_/

Comment Biggest problem with Facebook and Twitter (Score 2) 52

Is that they're pro-free speech, except when they aren't. When they aren't, you get punished for nebulous reasons and every pedantic poindexter comes racing out to give the lecture "the first amendment only protects you against the government." Well no shit, but that doesn't change the fact that within the scope of the user agreement there is a claimed standard that applies universally, but is actually applied quite selectively. You actually do have a right to tell Facebook that you think they're full of shit and demean them when they are biased and one-sided because even if they put "it's ultimately up to their judgment" in the service agreement, their judgment is still bound to the framework and rules they laid down. A company cannot publicly proclaim to stand against hate speech and then claim that "kill all the honkies" is ok, but "kill all the n-----s" is hate speech because that is a public proclamation that their own standards in the contract they claim to use against you are going to be enforced in bad faith.

Comment If you want to punish speech that "promotes hatred (Score -1) 321

How about you start with fining and imprisoning government officials who make statements like Germany has to accept more refugees and must accept that they will commit a lot more crime than Germans (and by crimes we mean rapes, felony assault, child molestation and the occasional act of attempted terrorism, not stealing some extra spending money or bread).

Comment They priced themselves out of the market (Score 4, Interesting) 227

I remember looking at Github Enterprise and finding their licensing model insane. It seemed like a recurring fee of about $5k/20 users/year as a starting point. There was no way I could have solid it to our leadership. $500 for only 20 users, easy sell. $5k? That is a site license of IntelliJ Ultimate or this.

Comment Bad Summary (Score 1) 98

The summary leaves out several very important limits on this new law:

1. It does not apply to business that don't sell directly in interstate commerce. (This is narrower than the usual "affecting commerce" language Congress likes to use.) So your local lawn-care service for example may be exempt.

2. It only applies to businesses that use "form" contracts.

3. It only applies to those "form" contracts if the customer does not have a meaningful opportunity to negotiate.

Comment That's not the real issue (Score 1) 59

Stop breaking the laws you are supposed to uphold, you fucks.

The problem isn't the officers who break the law, but the police commanders that defend them. The majority of people would not care about police breaking the law if there were direct and legal consequences for the officers on a fairly consistent basis. There is a minority that would hate the police even if cops who break the law are consistently held legally accountable just because they believe in collective judgment and demand perfection from other groups that their own could not provide.

Groups like BLM are part of the problem on police reform. When Castro died, BLM mourned him because he gave refuge to known cop killers. What is even worse, Castro was precisely the sort of leader domestically that is the stuff of BLM nightmares in terms of police brutality. Think stop and frisk over guns and drugs is bad? How about stop and frisk over having extra cans of beans? That literally happens in Cuba all the dang time. The fact that BLM has not be totally marginalized and ridiculed into obscurity by opponents of police brutality because many of them have blinders that make them sympathetic is part of why the movement isn't getting much traction.

Comment Accountability... (Score 1) 37

If we were a little more like the Chinese in dealing with our companies, you'd see less of this. Throwing an executive in general lock up has a certain pour encourager les autres effect that fining a company and letting them debate a sock party for the people responsible does not have. It's like I said after Deepwater Horizon. You really think if we left BP alone but brought the death penalty for felony murder against the executive(s) responsible for 11 oilmen dying and that much environment damage that the oil industry wouldn't stand up, sphincters puckered and be good Boy Scouts on worker safety and the environment?

Slashdot Top Deals

In the realm of scientific observation, luck is granted only to those who are prepared. - Louis Pasteur

Working...